Author
Listed:
- Mengistie Kassahun Tariku
- Gezahegn Eshetu Mekuriya
- Habtamu Wagnew Abuhay
- Lidetu Demoze
- Gedefaw Abeje
- Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke
- Habtamu Abebe Getahun
- Samuel Teferi Chanie
- Gelila Yitageasu
- Gebrie Getu Alemu
- Asebe Hagos
Abstract
Background: Hookworms are the most common soil-transmitted helminths in tropical and subtropical regions. Although infection with hookworms is a principal cause of maternal anemia, there is limited consolidated evidence on pooled prevalence and its proportion among intestinal helminths infections in pregnant women in Ethiopia. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of infection with hookworms and its proportion among intestinal helminths in pregnant women in Ethiopia. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between 2010 and 2024 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and African Journals Online using relevant search terms related to Ethiopia. Data extraction was performed using a standardized Excel spreadsheet after assessing the quality of the studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were analyzed using STATA version 17. A random-effects model using the DerSimonian–Laird method was employed to account for heterogeneity, which was assessed using the I² statistic and the p-value of Cochrane’s Q test. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Begg’s, and Egger’s tests. Results were presented using forest plots with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 33 studies, including 13367 pregnant women were analysed. Among these 4161 women infected with intestinal Helminthiases, including 1853 cases of infection with hookworms. The pooled prevalence of infection with hookworms among pregnant women in Ethiopia was 12.21% (95% CI: 9.46%–14.95%), while the pooled proportion of hookworms among intestinal helminths was 44.0% (95% CI: 33.24%–55.75%). Regionally, prevalence was highest in Amhara (13.11%, 95% CI: 9.17%–17.05%) and the lowest in Gambella (4.44%, 95% CI: 2.32%–6.57%). The proportion was highest in Amhara (67.86%, 95% CI: 57.87%–77.84%) and lowest in Harerge (16.67%, 95% CI: 9.21%–24.12%). By diagnostic method, the concentration technique yielded the highest prevalence (16.11%, 95% CI: 9.31%–22.90%), while combined methods showed the lowest (9.48%, 95% CI: 6.14%–12.83%). Conclusion: Infection with hookworms remains a public health concern among pregnant women in Ethiopia (pooled prevalence: 12.21%), accounting for 44.0% of intestinal helminths. Marked regional variation exists, highest in Amhara and lowest in Gambella. Prevalence estimates varied by diagnostic method, with higher values from concentration techniques. Targeted interventions, improved sanitation, deworming, and standardized diagnostics are needed. Author summary: Hookworms are common soil-transmitted helminthic disease in tropical and subtropical regions, including Ethiopia. While low-intensity infections are often asymptomatic, moderate-to-heavy infections can contribute substantially to anemia and adverse maternal health outcomes, particularly among pregnant women. Despite its public health importance, national-level evidence on the overall burden of infection with hookworms in this population has been limited and fragmented. In this study, we systematically reviewed and analyzed data from multiple studies conducted across Ethiopia to estimate both the overall prevalence of infection with hookworms among pregnant women and its proportion among intestinal helminth infections.
Suggested Citation
Mengistie Kassahun Tariku & Gezahegn Eshetu Mekuriya & Habtamu Wagnew Abuhay & Lidetu Demoze & Gedefaw Abeje & Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke & Habtamu Abebe Getahun & Samuel Teferi Chanie & Gelila Yitageasu &, 2026.
"Prevalence of hookworm infection and its proportion among pregnant women with intestinal helminth infection in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-29, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014376
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014376
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.