IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0014369.html

Shared risk factors for malaria and schistosomiasis co-infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Max M Lang
  • Bethany Lyne
  • Christl A Donnelly
  • Goylette F Chami

Abstract

Background: Malaria and schistosomiasis are co-endemic across sub-Saharan Africa, where both diseases often co-occur, yet the shared risk factors for co-infection remain poorly synthesized. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify shared risk factors for malaria-Schistosoma co-infection and to narratively synthesize the statistical methodologies applied in the literature. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus, and Global Health from inception to February 19, 2025 (PROSPERO CRD420250648824). We pooled effect sizes for risk factors across sociodemographic, environmental, and behavioral dimensions. Fixed-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was used to calculate pooled Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Quality Assessment tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies by the National Institutes of Health. Results: We screened 1,345 records and included 30 studies conducted across 12 African countries. A meta-analysis of 23 studies showed that schistosomiasis infection was associated with 1.27 times higher odds of malaria (OR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.17–1.39). Narrative synthesis identified age as an important predictor, with risk consistently peaking in older children and adolescents (typically 8–17 years). Associations with sex were setting-dependent: males had significantly higher odds of co-infection in community-based studies (OR 2.08; 95% CI: 1.64–2.63), whereas no significant association was found in school-based studies (OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.64–1.19). Direct water contact was strongly associated with co-infection (OR 2.53; 95% CI: 1.60–4.00). Heterogeneity was high (I2 > 80%), warranting caution during interpretation. Only one study was categorized as high risk of bias. Conclusion: The association between malaria and schistosomiasis appears to be associated with overlapping environmental and behavioral exposures, specifically water contact in older children. Author summary: Malaria and schistosomiasis are parasitic diseases that frequently infect the same individuals, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. While co-infection is known to be associated with worse clinical outcomes like anemia, the specific behaviors and environmental conditions correlated with concurrent infection are not well understood. We performed a systematic review of 30 studies to identify risk factors for co-infection. We found that individuals infected with schistosomiasis were 27% more likely to harbor malaria. Our analysis suggests this relationship is associated with shared risk factors rather than biological interaction. Risk appears to peak in older children and adolescents (ages 8–17 years). Gender roles influence risk differently depending on the setting: males were at higher risk in community settings, likely due to occupational activities like fishing or farming, but this risk disappeared in school settings where boys and girls have similar daily routines. Direct water contact was a risk factor for co-infection, but it was inconsistently measured across studies. Our findings support the case for investigation of interventions to support integrated disease control for schistosomiasis and malaria.

Suggested Citation

  • Max M Lang & Bethany Lyne & Christl A Donnelly & Goylette F Chami, 2026. "Shared risk factors for malaria and schistosomiasis co-infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014369
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014369&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.