IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0014065.html

Comparative susceptibility of Old World and New World bat cell lines to Zika virus: Insights into viral replication and inflammatory responses

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander J Brown
  • Anna C Fagre
  • Julianna Gilson
  • Jennifer Horton
  • J Nick Allen
  • Ricardo Rivero
  • Mahsan Karimi
  • Emily Speranza
  • Michael Letko
  • Stephanie N Seifert

Abstract

Background: The emergence of flaviviruses and other arboviruses in novel geographic locations, arthropod vectors, and vertebrate amplification hosts complicates control and eradication efforts. Many flaviviruses continue to impact global health, including Zika virus (ZIKV) which has expanded to a global health threat, yet many questions remain surrounding its ecology and inter-epidemic maintenance. While bats are known to harbor several medically important viruses without clinical disease, their role in the sylvatic transmission cycle of arboviruses remains unresolved. Reports describing the susceptibility of different bat species to infection with ZIKV are inconsistent, and the immunological mechanisms underpinning this variability have not been well-characterized. Methodology/Principal Findings: We compared the permissiveness and immune responses of cell lines derived from two frugivorous bat species: the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). Using multi-step growth curves, we compared infection dynamics of two genetically distinct ZIKV strains, African lineage (ZIKV/MR766) and Asian-American lineage (ZIKV/PRVABC59) and compared transcriptomic responses to both lineages in susceptible bat-derived cell lines. Conclusions/Significance: Our results highlight species-specific differences in ZIKV susceptibility across bat-derived cell lines, with both ZIKV strains replicating to high titers on R. aegyptiacus cells but not on A. jamaicensis cells. We detected pro-inflammatory transcriptomic signatures in R. aegyptiacus cells infected with both ZIKV lineages. Notably, both the Asian-American and African ZIKV lineages demonstrated some capacity for immune evasion and productive replication in the R. aegyptiacus cell line. Author summary: This study investigates how different lineages of Zika virus (ZIKV) interact with bat cells, specifically examining the cellular inflammatory and antiviral responses. We compare host-virus interactions using cell lines derived from two frugivorous bat species (Rousettus aegyptiacus and Artibeus jamaicensis). Our results highlight differences in cellular permissiveness and spur additional questions surrounding how infection outcomes are shaped by host taxonomy, viral lineage, and host-virus interactions at the cellular level. Surprisingly, cells derived from R. aegyptiacus, the reservoir host of Marburg virus, revealed pro-inflammatory transcriptomic signatures that reflect what is seen during acute infection of humans and non-human primates. African lineage ZIKV (MR766) caused a more robust immune response than Asian-American lineage ZIKV (PRVABC59). In contrast, our A. jamaicensis-derived cells appeared resistant to infection with both ZIKV lineages. Our data highlight the importance of comparing host-virus interactions across possible host species and suggest that events occurring after viral entry may shape infection outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander J Brown & Anna C Fagre & Julianna Gilson & Jennifer Horton & J Nick Allen & Ricardo Rivero & Mahsan Karimi & Emily Speranza & Michael Letko & Stephanie N Seifert, 2026. "Comparative susceptibility of Old World and New World bat cell lines to Zika virus: Insights into viral replication and inflammatory responses," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014065
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014065&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pmed00:1002203 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.