IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0013930.html

A systematic review and meta-analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward anthrax prevention and control in Ethiopia: Implication for a one health policy

Author

Listed:
  • Ayenew Takele Alemu
  • Birtuedil Yibeltal Beyene
  • Gashaw Molla
  • Friehiwot Molla
  • Wolde Melese Ayele
  • Gashaw Melkie Bayeh
  • Mahider Awoke Belay
  • Kindie Bayih Geremew
  • Abathun Temesgen
  • Mekuanint Taddele Tessema
  • Melaku Laikemariam
  • Almaw Genet Yeshiwas
  • Atirsaw Assefa Melikamu

Abstract

Background: Anthrax is one of the tropical diseases that are often overlooked... Anthrax’s burden extends beyond its effects on health; it also has an economic cost. Implementing One Health policies requires knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about anthrax prevention and control. However, there is no nationally aggregated evidence in Ethiopia. Therefore, this review was done to generate evidence and offer suggestions for incorporating KAP findings into One Health strategy to prevent and control anthrax in Ethiopia. Methods: The protocol was registered in a PROSPERO with a reference CRD420251141478 and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered. The electronic databases: Pub-Med, Scopus, Web of Science, CAB abstracts, AGRICOLA, and Google-Scholar were searched to retrieve the included studies using key search terms with database specific search strings. Studies that reported KAP outcomes in Ethiopian and were published only in English language irrespective of publication time were included in this review.. The random-effects model was used to pool effect sizes using STATA 17 software. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, while sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the pooled estimates. Forest plots were used to display the results. Results: This study included 17 articles with 8,369 participants that met the inclusion criteria. Our synthesis found that consuming raw meat, backyard slaughtering, improperly disposing of carcasses, and sharing a home with animals are common risk factors for anthrax infection in Ethiopia. The pooled knowledge, attitude, and practice levels of anthrax prevention and control were 51.25% (95% CI: 43.93, 58.58; I2 = 98.01%), 59.26% (95% CI: 50.43%, 68.08%; I2 = 98.33%), and 50.62% (95% CI: 42.95, 58.29; I2 = 97.93%), respectively. Conclusions: Half of the communities in Ethiopia remain with suboptimal knowledge, attitudes, and practices for anthrax prevention and control. This could lead to ineffective outbreak management, delayed reporting, and continuous transmission of anthrax to humans and animals, particularly in endemic areas. As a result, from a One Health perspective, an integrated multisectoral intervention is urgently required to promote collaboration among the human, animal, and environmental health sectors. Why was this study done?: Anthrax is a common animal-to-human transmissible disease that is often overlooked. However, Ethiopian communities’ knowledge, attitude, and practice have not been evidenced nationally. The purpose of this study was to give the first national estimates of community knowledge, attitude, and practice related to anthrax prevention and control in Ethiopia, as well as insights into a One Health policy. What did the researchers do and find?: We pooled and analysed the findings of all relevant studies on KAP outcomes related to anthrax in Ethiopia. The key findings were: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Ayenew Takele Alemu & Birtuedil Yibeltal Beyene & Gashaw Molla & Friehiwot Molla & Wolde Melese Ayele & Gashaw Melkie Bayeh & Mahider Awoke Belay & Kindie Bayih Geremew & Abathun Temesgen & Mekuanint , 2026. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward anthrax prevention and control in Ethiopia: Implication for a one health policy," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013930
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013930&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.