IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0013748.html

Understanding healing: A comparative analysis in chronic diseases with leprosy—A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Joydeepa Darlong
  • Joy Kim
  • Subhojit Goswami
  • Chhavi Tyagi
  • Govindasamy Karthikeyan
  • Mythily Vandana S Charles
  • Aashish Masih
  • Rama V Baru

Abstract

Background: Healing in leprosy has long been synonymous with bacteriological cure, often overlooking persistent disability, stigma, and psychosocial consequences. Insights from other chronic diseases may inform a broader understanding of healing. recovery. Objectives: To map how healing is defined and experienced in leprosy, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, diabetes mellitus, and schizophrenia, and to identify conceptual and practical lessons relevant for post-cure leprosy care. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for qualitative studies (January 2012–December 2022) in English language from low- and middle-income countries. Eligible studies explored definitions, determinants, or models of healing in the five conditions. Data were charted and thematically synthesized across physical, psychological, socioeconomic, socio-relational, and spiritual domains following the Joanna Briggs approach. Results: Eighty-five studies met inclusion criteria (leprosy = 20, TB = 9, diabetes = 8, HIV = 36, schizophrenia = 12). Healing was most often defined as adaptation, resilience, or reintegration rather than cure. Across diseases, five interrelated dimensions—physical, psychological, socioeconomic, socio-relational, and spiritual—shaped recovery. Compared to other chronic conditions, leprosy literature remained largely biomedical, with limited exploration of psychosocial and spiritual healing. Conclusions: Achieving zero leprosy requires person-centred care that embraces multidimensional healing. The proposed 5D Healing Framework offers a roadmap for integrating psychosocial, economic, and spiritual dimensions into post-cure leprosy services. Author summary: Healing from leprosy has been defined by bacteriological cure, yet many people continue to live with the effects of disability, stigma, and social exclusion long after treatment ends. This scoping review explored how healing is conceptualized across five chronic conditions—leprosy, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, diabetes mellitus, and schizophrenia—to draw lessons that can guide holistic leprosy care. By analysing 85 studies from low- and middle-income countries, we found that recovery is not limited to physical health but includes psychological, social, economic, and spiritual well-being. Other chronic diseases have progressively integrated counselling, peer support, and livelihood interventions into their care models, while leprosy programs remain largely biomedical. We propose a 5D Healing Framework—covering physical, psychological, socio-relational, socioeconomic, and spiritual dimensions—to help design comprehensive, person-centred post-cure leprosy services. This approach emphasizes that achieving “zero leprosy” must include restoring dignity, belonging, and purpose for persons affected, not merely eliminating infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Joydeepa Darlong & Joy Kim & Subhojit Goswami & Chhavi Tyagi & Govindasamy Karthikeyan & Mythily Vandana S Charles & Aashish Masih & Rama V Baru, 2026. "Understanding healing: A comparative analysis in chronic diseases with leprosy—A scoping review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013748
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013748
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013748&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.