Author
Listed:
- Sisay Desale
- Getaneh Alemu
- Tadesse Hailu
Abstract
Background: Urogenital schistosomiasis caused by Schistosoma haematobium remains endemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Diagnosis traditionally relies on urine microscopy to detect parasite eggs; however, its sensitivity declines in low-intensity infections. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image analysis offers a promising approach to automate egg detection and enhance diagnostic accuracy, but its performance compared with standard microscopy is not well established. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines and checklist. Studies evaluating AI-assisted detection of S. haematobium compared with microscopy and/or molecular reference standards, published up to August 2025, were identified through searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, HINARI, Epistemonikos, Science Direct, Google Scholar and grey literature sources. Eligible studies were selected based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I² statistic. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14.1 and Review Manager version 5.4.1. Results: Ten studies (15 datasets, 5,564 urine samples) conducted in sub-Saharan Africa met the inclusion criteria. AI-assisted tools demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. The pooled sensitivity was 88% (95%CI 83%-91%) and pooled specificity was 89% (95% CI 83%-93%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 54.00 (95% CI 30.41-95.88), indicating strong discrimination between infected and uninfected cases. The SROC curve yielded an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96), reflecting excellent overall accuracy. Heterogeneity across studies was high (I² = 100%), suggesting results varied by the specific AI platform and study context. Conclusion: AI-assisted microscopic diagnosis of S. haematobium achieved very good in this meta-analysis. These automated tools, whether smartphone-based or bench-top systems, showed promise for detecting infections and could help screen populations in endemic areas. With further validation in field settings and comparison to highly sensitive reference tests, AI diagnostic technology may become a valuable tool to improve case detection and support schistosomiasis control and elimination efforts. Author summary: Schistosomiasis (often called bilharzia) is a disease caused by a type of blood fluke worm that lives in freshwater snails. It affects millions of people, especially in poor tropical regions. Schistosoma haematobium is the species that causes urinary schistosomiasis. Infected people often suffer from blood in the urine, bladder problems, and kidney damage. Controlling schistosomiasis means finding and treating infected people. However, the usual way to diagnose it is by looking for parasite eggs under a microscope that can miss many infections, particularly when the number of eggs is low or lab facilities are limited. This makes it hard to reach goals for elimination of the disease. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a new solution. Scientists have developed devices like smartphone microscopes or automated scanners that use AI programs to recognize parasite eggs in urine pictures. We collected and analyzed all published studies on these AI tools for detecting S. haematobium. We found that AI-based diagnostics are very accurate: on average they correctly identified 88% of infected cases and correctly ruled out about 89% of uninfected cases. In simpler terms, AI tools got nearly 9 out of 10 results right. Importantly, these tools work quickly and do not require highly trained experts. Our findings suggest that AI-assisted diagnosis could be a game-changer in low-resource settings. By making it easier and faster to screen for schistosomiasis, these technologies could help health workers find more infections that would otherwise be missed. Better detection means more people get treated, which lowers the spread of disease. In the long run, using AI tools for schistosomiasis could support global efforts to control and even eliminate this neglected tropical disease.
Suggested Citation
Sisay Desale & Getaneh Alemu & Tadesse Hailu, 2026.
"Accuracy of AI-assisted diagnostic tools for Schistosoma haematobium: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013703
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013703
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.