Author
Listed:
- Stephanie A Shwiff
- Emily S Acheson
- Levi Altringer
- Patrick A Leighton
- Larissa Nituch
- Sarah Sykora
- François Viard
- Tore Buchanan
Abstract
Zoonotic diseases, particularly those originating in wildlife, pose significant public health and economic risks. Rabies, a viral zoonosis with near-100% case fatality in humans, is a prime example of such a threat, especially in regions like North America where wildlife—such as raccoons—serve as key reservoirs. This study assesses the economic efficiency of Ontario, Canada’s raccoon rabies control program, which combines oral rabies vaccination (ORV), trap-vaccinate-release (TVR), and surveillance strategies. Using a spatial agent-based epidemiological model, the study estimates the benefits and costs of intervention compared to a no-intervention scenario over the period 2015–2025. Benefits were quantified as avoided public health costs, including post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), animal testing (AT), and human exposure investigations (INVT), and converted to 2023 CAD. Results show that the intervention prevented significant economic losses, with benefit-cost ratios ranging from 1.5 to 14.16 depending on assumed rates of intervention necessity, confirming the program’s cost-effectiveness. This analysis not only supports continued investment in wildlife rabies control but also provides a scalable economic framework for other zoonotic disease management programs utilizing a One Health approach.Author summary: In 2015, Ontario faced the largest raccoon rabies outbreak in Canadian history. The Ontario government implemented control measures to contain the outbreak. Our research explores the economic benefit of intervention strategies used by modeling three scenarios: continued control measures until 2025, ending control measures in 2020, and no interventions at all. By estimating the human population at risk under each scenario, we monetized the benefits of intervention. Our findings indicate that continuing control measures until 2025 would prevent the most cases of rabies, significantly reducing healthcare costs associated to post-exposure prophylaxis, animal rabies testing, and human exposure investigations. The benefit-cost analysis shows that for every dollar spent on rabies control, between $1.5 CAD and $14 CAD in healthcare costs were saved, depending on the scenario. This translates into total savings ranging from $53 million CAD to $495 million CAD by 2025. This research underscores the value of sustained intervention efforts in managing wildlife diseases and protecting public health. It highlights how proactive management cand lead to substantial economic and health benefits, reinforcing the importance of the “One Health” approach, which integrates human, animal, and environmental health strategies.
Suggested Citation
Stephanie A Shwiff & Emily S Acheson & Levi Altringer & Patrick A Leighton & Larissa Nituch & Sarah Sykora & François Viard & Tore Buchanan, 2025.
"Benefit-cost analysis of raccoon rabies control in Ontario, Canada,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013696
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013696
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.