IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0013431.html

A systematic review of mathematical models for soil-transmitted helminthiasis control strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Lemjini Masandawa
  • Miracle Amadi
  • Isambi S Mbalawata
  • Safari Kinung’hi
  • Silas S Mirau

Abstract

Background: Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) remains an important public health challenge in endemic settings, and mathematical transmission models are widely used to evaluate STH transmission and control strategies. However, no systematic review has comprehensively classified STH transmission models according to their biological and structural characteristics and intervention designs while examining the operational incorporation of World Health Organization (WHO) roadmap targets and projected timelines. This review therefore aimed to classify STH transmission models and interventions and examine the operational incorporation of WHO roadmap targets and projected timelines. Methodology: We searched Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for English-language studies published between January 2015 and December 2024. Five reviewers participated in screening and data extraction. Models were classified by transmission unit, mathematical framework, and population structure, and interventions by strategy, delivery platform, target population, and treatment regimen. WHO alignment was classified as explicit or implicit against the 2011–2020 and 2021–2030 roadmaps using pre-defined criteria. Projected timelines were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using the Assessment of Modelling Studies tool. Findings: Forty-two studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Parasite-based (69%), age-structured (67%), and deterministic (62%) formulations were frequently represented than host-based (31%), homogeneous (33%), and stochastic (38%) formulations, respectively. Preventive chemotherapy was the most frequently modelled intervention strategy (81%), whereas integrated strategies represented 19%. Thirty-three studies (79%) aligned with at least one WHO roadmap objective, including 12 (29%) explicitly and 21 (50%) implicitly aligned studies. Fourteen studies (33%) reported projected timelines for WHO-relevant outcomes. External validation was reported in 14% of studies. Conclusion: The literature was predominantly characterised by parasite-based, age-structured, and deterministic formulations, with preventive chemotherapy forming the principal intervention focus. Integrated strategies were less represented. Projected timelines and external validation were also infrequently reported. Models addressing programme planning or policy evaluation could benefit from relevant integrated interventions, projected timelines, and external validation. Author summary: Soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) remain an important public health challenge in endemic settings. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established targets for reducing STH-related morbidity and advancing elimination as a public health problem. Mathematical models are widely used to evaluate STH transmission and control strategies, but their structural characteristics, intervention designs, incorporation of WHO roadmap targets, and projected timelines have not been systematically reviewed. We reviewed 42 mathematical modelling studies published between 2015 and 2024 to classify STH transmission models and interventions and examine the operational incorporation of WHO roadmap targets and reported projected timelines. The reviewed studies were predominantly parasite-based, age-structured, and deterministic. Preventive chemotherapy was the most frequently represented intervention strategy, while integrated strategies were less frequently represented. Most studies aligned with at least one WHO roadmap objective, although implicit alignment was more common than explicit alignment. Only a subset reported projected timelines for WHO-relevant outcomes, while external validation and uncertainty quantification were infrequently reported. Overall, the findings provide a structured overview of current STH modelling approaches and identify less frequently represented areas. Models addressing programme planning or policy evaluation could benefit from relevant integrated interventions, clearly defined WHO targets, projected timelines, validation, and uncertainty assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lemjini Masandawa & Miracle Amadi & Isambi S Mbalawata & Safari Kinung’hi & Silas S Mirau, 2026. "A systematic review of mathematical models for soil-transmitted helminthiasis control strategies," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013431
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013431&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.