IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0013235.html

Scoping review of knowledge, attitudes, and practices to zoonotic diseases among abattoir workers and residents in proximity to abattoirs in low-middle income countries

Author

Listed:
  • Oluwafemi Babatunde Daodu
  • Patricia Uche Ogbo
  • Ahmed Sherif Isa
  • Toyosi Yekeen Raheem
  • Uche Thecla Igbasi
  • Oluwabukola Mary Ola
  • Oluwatosin Eunice Olorunmoteni
  • Olabisi Adejibike Oduwole
  • Oluchukwu Perpetual Okeke
  • Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu
  • Olajide Odunayo Sobande

Abstract

Background: Zoonotic diseases pose a significant public health threat in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This scoping review aimed to map the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of abattoir workers and residents living near abattoirs regarding zoonotic diseases in LMICs. Methodology/principal findings: A comprehensive search was conducted in SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles published between 2010 and 2023. Studies were included if they were conducted in LMICs, published in English, and focused on the KAP of zoonotic diseases among abattoir workers or nearby residents. Data extraction was conducted using a double-blind approach, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Of the 4,276 articles screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted in nine LMICs, with Nigeria (6; 38%) and Ethiopia (3; 19%) accounting for the highest number. Most studies reported on knowledge (10; 63%) and practices (12; 75%), while 4 (25%) addressed attitudes. Abattoir workers showed varied knowledge of zoonotic diseases, but substantial gaps in preventive practices were observed. Notably, no studies examined the KAP of residents living near abattoirs. Conclusion/significance: This review underscores the need for targeted interventions to improve KAP among abattoir workers and to expand research to include nearby residents. A conceptual framework was developed to identify factors influencing KAP and guide future research, education, and policy development for zoonotic disease prevention in LMICs. Author summary: Zoonotic diseases, infectious diseases transmitted between animals and humans, present a significant public health concern causing an estimated 2.5 billion cases and 2.7 million deaths annually. This scoping review analysed 16 studies from nine LMICs to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of abattoir workers regarding these diseases. The findings revealed that while workers showed varying levels of knowledge, their preventive practices were often inadequate. Many did not use personal protective equipment and frequently consumed unprocessed animal products such as raw meat and milk. Importantly, no study examined the KAP of residents living near abattoirs, revealing a major research gap. We developed a conceptual framework based on the results to map the individual, cultural, and institutional factors influencing KAP. This framework can guide future studies, interventions, and policy decisions to reduce the risks of zoonotic disease transmission in LMICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluwafemi Babatunde Daodu & Patricia Uche Ogbo & Ahmed Sherif Isa & Toyosi Yekeen Raheem & Uche Thecla Igbasi & Oluwabukola Mary Ola & Oluwatosin Eunice Olorunmoteni & Olabisi Adejibike Oduwole & Oluc, 2026. "Scoping review of knowledge, attitudes, and practices to zoonotic diseases among abattoir workers and residents in proximity to abattoirs in low-middle income countries," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013235
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013235&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.