Author
Listed:
- Sarah Nascimento Silva
- Endi Lanza Galvão
- Janaína de Pina Carvalho
- Mayra Soares Moreira
- Tália Santana Machado de Assis
- Glaucia Cota
Abstract
Background: Healthcare expenses represent a proportionally greater burden for the poorest populations, which further exacerbates the negative impact of the disease on the individual’s quality of life and productivity. Objective: The study aimed to identify the direct and indirect costs during the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) from the patients’ perspective and examine factors influencing the costs burden among CL patients. Methods: A prospective cost analysis was conducted between April 2022 and April 2023 through interviews with patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CL. Direct costs were estimated using the micro-costing approach, and indirect costs using the human capital method. Descriptive analyses and hypothesis tests were conducted for associations between costs and sociodemographic and clinical variables, with a significance level of 5%. Results: The study included 68 patients, predominantly male (77.9%) with an average age of 53 years. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was the most common clinical form (76.4%), with new cases accounting for 79.4% of participants. Patients averaged 3.5 outpatient visits per CL treatment cycle, with miltefosine and intravenous meglumine antimoniate being the most prescribed therapies. Direct costs per treatment cycle averaged USD 117.36, attributed to transportation, food, and medical exams. Indirect costs from lost workdays amounted to USD 9,936.58, with an average of USD 160.12 per patient. Catastrophic expenditure (>10% of monthly income) was observed in 42.6% of families, significantly associated with direct cost, bacterial infection, and sociodemographic factors such as gender, age, and distance traveled. Conclusions: This study underscores the substantial economic burden of CL treatment on patients, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to mitigate financial hardship, particularly among vulnerable socioeconomic groups. Author Summary: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected disease that mainly affects the most vulnerable populations in tropical and subtropical countries. The disease causes lesions on the skin and mucous membranes that can lead to physical effects, functional impairment and loss of productivity, as well as psychological and economic impacts on individuals. Although the disease is common in some regions, there are few treatment options, many of which are toxic and require monitoring. Many patients are referred to specialised services that receive patients from different regions to diagnose and treat the disease. In this study, patients at a referral centre were asked about the out-of-pocket expenses they have to pay while receiving treatment for CL that are not covered by the health system, such as transport, food, medicines, services and absence from work. The results of these studies will be important in measuring costs from the patient’s perspective and understanding the impact that costs during treatment for CL can have on family income.
Suggested Citation
Sarah Nascimento Silva & Endi Lanza Galvão & Janaína de Pina Carvalho & Mayra Soares Moreira & Tália Santana Machado de Assis & Glaucia Cota, 2025.
"The burden of out-of-pocket and indirect costs of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients in Minas Gerais, Brazil,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013020
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0013020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.