Author
Listed:
- Paul Loubet
- Chloé Magnan
- Florian Salipante
- Théo Pastre
- Anne Keriel
- David O’Callaghan
- Albert Sotto
- Jean-Philippe Lavigne
Abstract
Introduction: Brucellosis, a zoonotic infectious disease caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella, remains a significant global health concern in many parts of the world. Traditional diagnostic methods, including serological tests, suffer from limitations, including low sensibility and high false-positive rates, emphasizing the need for improved diagnostic strategies. In this study, we aimed to optimize diagnostic accuracy by reevaluating serological tests and exploring novel diagnostic algorithms. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using sera collected between June 2012 and June 2023 at the French National Reference Center for Brucella. Various serological tests, including Rose Bengal plate test (RBT), standard agglutination test (SAT), Brucellacapt, and ELISA for IgM and IgG, were performed. Different diagnostic algorithms were evaluated, combining RBT with SAT, Brucellacapt, and ELISA to enhance the performance of diagnostic tests. Results: Among 3587 sera analyzed, 148 were confirmed cases of human brucellosis. Individual serological tests exhibited good sensitivity and specificity but lacked diagnostic accuracy. However, combining RBT with SAT or Brucellacapt significantly improved diagnostic performance, with reduced false positives. The most promising results were observed when an algorithm was built combining RBT, Brucellacapt, and ELISA for IgM and IgG (a score value of 0.5 with 90.5% for sensitivity, 99.7% for specificity, 92.4% for PPV, and 99.6% for NPV). Conclusions: Serological tests remain crucial for brucellosis diagnosis, but their limitations necessitate innovative diagnostic approaches. Combining multiple serological tests in diagnostic algorithms shows promise in improving diagnostic accuracy. Efforts to refine diagnostic, strengthen surveillance, and raise awareness are essential for effective brucellosis control, particularly in resource-limited settings. Author summary: Brucellosis is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella. This disease remains a significant global health concern in many parts of the world. Traditional diagnostic methods include serological tests. However, these tests have major limitations due to their low sensibility and high false-positive rates. This poses a significant challenge in clinical practice, emphasizing the necessity for careful interpretation of test results and the development of more specific diagnostic tools. In this study, we assess the utility of traditional and easily accessible serological tests. Instead of using them individually, we decided to integrate the results of these multiple testing methods. We highlight the value of combining serological results into an algorithm to enhance the diagnosis of brucellosis and achieve greater overall accuracy in diagnosis. Efforts to streamline diagnostic, bolster surveillance, and increase awareness are essential for controlling brucellosis, particularly in resource-limited settings with a high disease burden.
Suggested Citation
Paul Loubet & Chloé Magnan & Florian Salipante & Théo Pastre & Anne Keriel & David O’Callaghan & Albert Sotto & Jean-Philippe Lavigne, 2024.
"Diagnosis of brucellosis: Combining tests to improve performance,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012442
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012442
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.