IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0012347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The socioeconomic impacts of Rift Valley fever: A rapid review

Author

Listed:
  • Luke O’Neill
  • Simon Gubbins
  • Christian Reynolds
  • Georgina Limon
  • Kyriaki Giorgakoudi

Abstract

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a neglected vector-borne disease which is endemic in many countries across Africa and has seen recent geographical expansions into the Arabian Peninsula. RVF can cause severe infections in both animals and humans. RVF infections in livestock can lead to mass fatalities. In humans, the symptoms are nonspecific and can often lead to misdiagnosis. However, a small proportion progresses to haemorrhagic infection with a significantly higher mortality rate. The culmination of this can cause severe socioeconomic impacts.This review aims to identify the main socioeconomic impacts caused by RVF outbreaks as well as existing knowledge gaps.Ninety-three academic and grey papers were selected, covering 19 countries and 10 methodological approaches. A variety of socioeconomic impacts were found across all levels of society: Livestock trade disruptions consequently impacted local food security, local and national economies. Most livestock farmers in endemic countries are subsistence farmers and so rely on their livestock for sustenance and income. RVF outbreaks resulted in a variety of socioeconomic impacts, e.g., the inability to pay for school fees. Main barriers to vaccine uptake in communities were lack of access, funds, interest along with other social aspects. The occupational risks for women (and pregnant women) are largely unknown.To our knowledge, this is the first review on RVF to highlight the clear knowledge gap surrounding the potential gender differences on risks of RVF exposure, as well as differences on occupational health risk in pastoral communities. Further work is required to fill the gaps identified in this review and inform control policies.Author summary: Rift Valley fever (RVF) outbreaks have affected many regions globally with varying severity. The number of reported cases in animals and humans is patchy at best, with some countries not recording animal events. This review focuses on 3 main themes: Health Burden; Economic Impacts; and Prevention and Surveillance. The review explores socioeconomic impacts across local, regional, and national levels. We found women have varying degrees of risk to exposure of RVF; however, more research is required to better understand gender differences. RVF outbreaks tend to begin in livestock and spillover into humans. The complex disease dynamics are poorly understood because of the interactions between animals, humans, and the environment. This cross-boundary dynamics fall outside of the public health remit and into veterinary health. This allows for outbreaks to spread uncontrollably for some time. More research using a One Health Lens is required which explores these complex dynamics with the combination of different social aspects. This review highlights the wider impacts experienced at different levels of society and where there are major gaps in our knowledge. Further analysis into these gaps is required to and will aid policy makers in developing new control measures around RVF.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke O’Neill & Simon Gubbins & Christian Reynolds & Georgina Limon & Kyriaki Giorgakoudi, 2024. "The socioeconomic impacts of Rift Valley fever: A rapid review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012347
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012347&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.