IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0012236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ongoing transmission of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa 4.5 years after one round of triple-drug mass drug administration

Author

Listed:
  • Helen J Mayfield
  • Benn Sartorius
  • Sarah Sheridan
  • Maddison Howlett
  • Beatris Mario Martin
  • Robert Thomsen
  • Rossana Tofaeono-Pifeleti
  • Satupaitea Viali
  • Patricia M Graves
  • Colleen L Lau

Abstract

Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) remains a significant global issue. To eliminate LF as a public health problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends multiple rounds of mass drug administration (MDA). In certain scenarios, including when elimination targets have not been met with two-drug MDA, triple-drug MDA (using ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) is recommended. In this study, we report on antigen (Ag) and microfilaria (Mf) prevalence in eight primary sampling units (PSUs) in Samoa 4.5 years after one round of triple-drug MDA. Methodology: In 2023, community surveys were conducted in eight PSUs that had been surveyed previously in 2018 (between 1.5 and 3.5 months post triple-drug MDA) and 2019 (six to eight-months post triple-drug MDA). Fifteen houses were randomly selected in each PSU with household members aged ≥ 5 years invited to participate. Blood samples were tested for Ag and Mf. Principal findings: Ag-positive participants were observed in six of the eight PSUs, and Ag prevalence was significantly above the 1% threshold in four PSUs. The presence of Mf-positive participants in five PSUs confirms the presence of residual active infections. Conclusions/Significance: This study provides evidence of persistent LF transmission in Samoa 4.5 years after one round of triple-drug MDA, confirming that one round was insufficient for interruption of transmission in this setting. Our findings highlight the negative impact of delaying MDA rounds, for example, due to public health emergencies. Author summary: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends triple-drug mass drug administration (MDA) for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem for countries where targets have not been achieved using two-drug MDA, and where onchocerciasis is non-endemic. In 2018, Samoa was the first country to implement a national triple-drug MDA. This study surveyed 623 randomly selected participants across eight primary sampling units (PSUs) in Samoa, 4.5 years after the first round of triple-drug MDA. These results support the current WHO recommendations that multiple rounds of triple-drug MDA are required to interrupt transmission. A gap of 4.5 years between rounds of triple-drug MDA can result in a resurgence, with persistence of LF transmission and burden levels comparable to those observed before the MDA.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen J Mayfield & Benn Sartorius & Sarah Sheridan & Maddison Howlett & Beatris Mario Martin & Robert Thomsen & Rossana Tofaeono-Pifeleti & Satupaitea Viali & Patricia M Graves & Colleen L Lau, 2024. "Ongoing transmission of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa 4.5 years after one round of triple-drug mass drug administration," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012236
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012236&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.