IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0011938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic accuracy of serological rk-39 test for visceral Leishmaniasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mihret Getnet
  • Addisu Minaye Dejen
  • Dessie Abebaw
  • Getachew Gedefaw Fentahun
  • Emebet Birhanu

Abstract

Background: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), or kala-azar, is a vector-borne tropical disease caused by a group of intracellular hemoflagellate protozoa belonging to the family of Trypanosomatide and the genus Leishmania. The disease is distributed around the world and transmitted via the bite of infected female Phlebotomine sandflies, and there is variation in the diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled global sensitivity and specificity of the rk-39 test and to evaluate if there is a difference between the different parts of the world. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. After setting eligibility criteria, literature was searched in four databases and one searching engine. Articles were screened, critically appraised, and extracted independently by two reviewers, and any disagreements were resolved with the involvement of a third person. The quality of the included studies had been assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS 2) tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined by bivariate random effect analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins’s I2, and when it was present, mitigation was conducted by using sensitivity analysis. Result: A total of 409 studies were identified, and finally 18 articles were eligible for the review with a total sample size of 5, 253. The bivariate random effect meta-analysis of the 7 diagnostic accuracy studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (0.76–0.95) and specificity of 0.86 (0.72–0.94). The +LR was 6.32 (95% CI: 2.85–14.02), the–LR was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.06–0.30), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 47.8 (95% CI: 11.3–203.2). Abdel-Latif (2018) was both an outlier and influential for sensitivity, and Walter (2011) was both an outlier and influential for specificity, and removing them from sensitivity and specificity, respectively, was beneficial for reducing the heterogeneity. Conclusion: Rk-39 is found to have highly accurate measures in the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Both sensitivity and specificity were found to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.91 (0.88–0.93) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (0.85–0.91). Ethical consideration: As we will use secondary data for the systematic review and meta-analysis, ethical concerns are not necessary. Author summary: Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne tropical disease distributed around the world and transmitted via the bite of infected sandflies. There are 3 main forms of the disease: visceral leishmaniasis, which is fatal if left untreated in over 95% of cases and is characterized by irregular bouts of fever, weight loss, enlargement of the spleen and liver, and anemia. The other form of the disease is cutaneous leishmaniasis, which causes skin lesions and life-long scars on exposed parts of the body. Whereas the third one, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, leads to partial or total destruction of the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth and throat.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihret Getnet & Addisu Minaye Dejen & Dessie Abebaw & Getachew Gedefaw Fentahun & Emebet Birhanu, 2024. "Diagnostic accuracy of serological rk-39 test for visceral Leishmaniasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011938
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011938
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011938&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.