IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0011870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leprosy relapse after multidrug therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fabiane Veronica da Silva
  • Gutembergue Santos de Sousa
  • Eric Brito Ferraz
  • Pãmela Rodrigues De Souza Silva
  • Juliana Akie Takahashi
  • Omar Ariel Espinosa
  • Jack Roberto Silva Fhon
  • Roberta Olmo Pinheiro
  • Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel
  • Zélia Ferreira Caçador Anastácio
  • Silvana Margarida Benevides Ferreira

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize the scientific evidence regarding the prevalence of leprosy relapse following multidrug therapy. Method: A systematic review was conducted following the JBI methodology for prevalence studies and reported according to the guidelines, with the registration number CRD42020177141. The inclusion criteria were based on the mnemonics (Population, Condition, Context). Population: Individuals of any age or sex diagnosed with leprosy relapse and previously treated with paucibacillary or multibacillary multidrug therapy. Conditions: Leprosy relapse after multidrug therapy, measured as the proportion of cases. Context: Studies conducted within the healthcare service settings. The databases searched included Medline, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, WoS, and Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA). The references were managed using Mendeley. A random-effects meta-analysis model was employed, and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins’ I² statistics. Results: Of 26 studies (a combined sample of 71,385 participants), 19 were included in the meta-analysis. A higher prevalence of relapse was observed in working-age males, multibacillary cases with a high bacillary load, and those with established physical disabilities. The estimated prevalence of relapse across studies ranged from 0% to 10%, with a pooled estimate of 4% in India (95% CI: 0.03–0.05). The overall point estimate for relapse using regular multidrug therapy was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of relapse varied according to the geographic location and type of multidrug therapy, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. These findings suggest that factors such as individual patient characteristics, treatment adherence, and capacity for healthcare services may have influenced the outcomes observed in this review. Author summary: Leprosy is considered a millennial and neglected disease. Despite the treatment with multidrug therapy (MDT) adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) having reduced the number of new cases of the disease, it remains a public health problem. The physical disabilities associated with late diagnosis, stigma, discrimination, social restrictions, and consequently the loss of quality of life can increase the disease’s prevalence. Another important issue that negatively impacts disease control is the occurrence of relapse after MDT, which can compromise therapeutic efficacy. The causes of relapse are commonly associated with therapeutic failure due to incomplete treatment, errors in operational classification, and the existence of resistant bacteria. This study aims to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of relapse after the adoption of MDT, which could contributed to the implementation of more assertive strategies to prevent the disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabiane Veronica da Silva & Gutembergue Santos de Sousa & Eric Brito Ferraz & Pãmela Rodrigues De Souza Silva & Juliana Akie Takahashi & Omar Ariel Espinosa & Jack Roberto Silva Fhon & Roberta Olmo Pi, 2025. "Leprosy relapse after multidrug therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011870
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011870&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.