Author
Listed:
- Janna M Schurer
- Mahlet Tadesse Admasu
- Mihigo Bonaventure
- Dieudonne Hakizimana
- Elijah Murara
- Lauren E MacDonald
- Ellen Rafferty
Abstract
Snakebite envenomation (SBE) is endemic to sub-Saharan Africa and generally over-represented in rural, remote, and impoverished agricultural communities. While poverty is an established risk factor, little research has been done to investigate the economic consequences of SBE. This cross-sectional, quantitative study aimed to measure out-of-pocket spending and lost income when a household member was bitten by a snake. In 2020, 732 snakebite survivors from Eastern Province (Rwanda) agreed to complete a survey administered by telephone. The survey focused on participant demographics, income, direct medical and non-medical costs, care-seeking decisions, and lost work during convalescence. Our results suggested that patients incurred the highest mean expenses when they sought care from hospitals (11 307 RWF or 12 USD) or traditional healers (5 836 RWF or 6 USD) but that the highest maximum cost was incurred from traditional healers (300 000 RWF or 313 USD). Across all victims, the total amount paid to traditional healers (3.4 million RWF or 3 537 USD) was 4.7 times higher than all other care providers combined. On average, families lost 111 814 RWF (117 USD) per snakebite in direct treatment costs and indirect productivity losses. Many victims sought care from traditional healers despite being eligible for free medical care. Altogether, this study serves as a reminder of the serious physical and financial consequences associated with SBE and provides justification for new investments into SBE prevention and care.Author summary: Snakebite is a life-threatening situation in sub-Saharan Africa, especially for rural and poor populations. Despite being preventable and treatable, it receives little attention from policymakers. The goal of this study was to estimate the financial losses experienced by snakebite victims due to treatment costs and lost work. Interviews with 732 snakebite victims from Eastern Province, Rwanda, indicated that a typical adult lost 12.0% of their annual income due to a single bite. Moreover, caregivers lost time and income when caring for a sick family member. Patients preferentially sought care from traditional healers rather than Community Health Workers, nurses or physicians, even when they qualified for free hospital care. Consequently, victims in our study group paid five times more to traditional healers (3.4 million RWF or 3 537 USD) than to all other care providers combined. Altogether, our analysis suggests that Rwandese lose 7.4 million USD each year in treatment costs and lost work due to snakebite. These results serve as evidence to policymakers that investments to prevention and treatment programs will not only reduce pain and suffering, but also contribute to national goals targeting poverty reduction.
Suggested Citation
Janna M Schurer & Mahlet Tadesse Admasu & Mihigo Bonaventure & Dieudonne Hakizimana & Elijah Murara & Lauren E MacDonald & Ellen Rafferty, 2023.
"“I sold my towel and shoes to pay the traditional healer”: Care-seeking costs and productivity losses among snakebite victims in Eastern Province, Rwanda,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-11, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011768
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011768
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.