IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0011670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of implementing a doxycycline test-and-treat strategy for onchocerciasis elimination among settled and semi-nomadic groups in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Trotignon
  • Ruth Dixon
  • Kareen Atekem
  • Laura Senyonjo
  • Joseph Kamgno
  • Didier Biholong
  • Iain Jones
  • Rogers Nditanchou

Abstract

Background: Onchocerciasis is a neglected tropical disease with 217.5 million people globally at risk of having the infection. In both settled and semi-nomadic communities of Massangam Health District in Cameroon, Sightsavers has been carrying out test-and-treat with doxycycline and twice-yearly ivermectin distribution. This paper focuses on the cost of test-and-treat with doxycycline in the two community contexts of settled and semi-nomadic. Methods: For the valuation, a combination of gross or micro-costing was used to identify cost components, as well as bottom-up and top-down approaches. The opportunity costs of vehicle and equipment use were estimated and included. Not included, however, were the opportunity costs of building use and Ministry of Public Health staff salaries. We only captured the incremental costs of implementing test-and-treat activities as part of a functional annual community-directed treatment with the ivermectin programme. Results: We estimate the economic cost per person tested and cost per person treated in Massangam to be US$135 and US$667 respectively. Total implementation cost in the settled community was US$79,409, and in the semi-nomadic community US$69,957. Overall, the total economic cost of implementing the doxycycline test-and-treat strategy for onchocerciasis elimination in Massangam came to US$168,345. Financial costs represented 91% of total costs. Conclusions: Unit costs of test-and-treat in both settled and semi-nomadic communities are higher than unit costs of community-directed treatment with ivermectin. However, it is critical to note that a two-year implementation shows a significantly larger reduction in infection prevalence than the preceding 20 years of annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin. Test-and-treat with doxycycline may be a cost-effective intervention in places where the prevalence of microfilaria is still high, or in hard-to-reach areas where community-directed treatment with ivermectin and MDA coverage are not high enough to stop transmission or where marginalised populations consistently miss treatment. Author summary: Onchocerciasis, also known as river blindness, is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by a parasitic nematode, Onchocerca volvulus. It is transmitted to humans through the bites of infected blackflies of the genus Simulium, which breed in fast-flowing rivers and streams. To eliminate transmission, a yearly distribution of ivermectin is conducted in infected areas. This medication kills the microfilaria but not the adult nematode, which is killed by doxycycline. Despite over 20 years of ivermectin mass distribution, the disease is still prevalent in the Massangam Health District in Cameroon. Therefore, alternative strategies have been discussed to stop transmission, including treatment of positive tested persons with doxycycline in both settled and nomadic communities. This paper estimated the total cost of implementation at US$168,345 in Massangam district, in order to compare it with the current elimination strategy and to demonstrate the potential effectiveness of the intervention–especially in high infection, hard-to-reach and loa loa co-infection settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Trotignon & Ruth Dixon & Kareen Atekem & Laura Senyonjo & Joseph Kamgno & Didier Biholong & Iain Jones & Rogers Nditanchou, 2023. "Cost of implementing a doxycycline test-and-treat strategy for onchocerciasis elimination among settled and semi-nomadic groups in Cameroon," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011670
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011670
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011670&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.