IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0011250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of short-term discontinuation of ivermectin-based chemoprevention on onchocerciasis transmission in endemic settings with long history of mass drug administration

Author

Listed:
  • Arnauld Efon-Ekangouo
  • Hugues C Nana-Djeunga
  • Narcisse Nzune-Toche
  • Raïssa Dongmo-Yemele
  • Jean Bopda
  • Viviane Ongbassomben
  • Laurentine Sumo
  • Anne Geiger
  • Thomas B Nutman
  • Joseph Kamgno

Abstract

Background: The control of onchocerciasis currently relies on annual distribution of single dose ivermectin. Because ivermectin has minimal effects on the adult parasite, mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns against onchocerciasis require at least 15 years of annual uninterrupted ivermectin distribution. Mathematical models have predicted that short-term disruption of MDA (as was seen during COVID-19) could impacted the microfilaridermia prevalence depending on the pre-control endemicity and the histories of treatment, requiring corrective measures (such as biannual MDA) to mitigate the effect on onchocerciasis elimination. Field evidence supporting this prediction, however, has yet to be gathered. This study aimed to assess the impact of ~2 years disruption of MDA on onchocerciasis transmission indicators. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2021 in seven villages of Bafia and Ndikinimeki, two health districts located in the Centre Region, Cameroon, where MDA has been ongoing for two decades, but interrupted in 2020 as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Volunteers aged 5 years and above were enrolled for clinical and parasitological examinations for onchocerciasis. Data were compared with pre-COVID-19 prevalence and intensity of infection from the same communities to measure changes over time. Principal findings: A total of 504 volunteers (50.3% males), aged 5–99 years (Median: 38; IQR: 15–54) was enrolled in the two health districts. The overall prevalence of microfilaridermia in 2021 was similar in Ndikinimeki health district (12.4%; 95% CI: 9.7–15.6) and Bafia health district (15.1%; 95% CI: 11.1–19.8) (p-value = 0.16). Microfilaridermia prevalences were either similar between 2018 and 2021 in the communities of Ndikinimeki health district (19.3% vs 12.8% (p = 0.057) for Kiboum 1; and 23.7% vs 21.4% (p = 0.814) for Kiboum 2), or higher in 2019 compared to 2021 in the communities of Bafia health district (33.3% vs 20.0% (p = 0.035) for Biatsota). The mean microfilarial densities in these communities dropped from 5.89 (95% CI: 4.77–7.28) mf/ss to 2.4 (95% CI: 1.68–3.45) mf/ss (p-value

Suggested Citation

  • Arnauld Efon-Ekangouo & Hugues C Nana-Djeunga & Narcisse Nzune-Toche & Raïssa Dongmo-Yemele & Jean Bopda & Viviane Ongbassomben & Laurentine Sumo & Anne Geiger & Thomas B Nutman & Joseph Kamgno, 2023. "Impact of short-term discontinuation of ivermectin-based chemoprevention on onchocerciasis transmission in endemic settings with long history of mass drug administration," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.