Author
Listed:
- Chanthawat Patikorn
- Ahmad Khaldun Ismail
- Syafiq Asnawi Zainal Abidin
- Iekhsan Othman
- Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Suthira Taychakhoonavudh
Abstract
Background: Despite domestic production of antivenoms in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, not all victims with snakebite envenomings indicated for antivenom received the appropriate or adequate effective dose of antivenom due to insufficient supply and inadequate access to antivenoms. We aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to project the potential economic and clinical impact of improving access to antivenoms when all snakebite envenomings in ASEAN countries were hypothetically treated with geographically appropriate antivenoms. Methodology: Using a decision analytic model with input parameters from published literature, local data, and expert opinion, we projected the impact of “full access” (100%) to antivenom, compared to “current access” in five most impacted ASEAN countries, including Indonesia (10%), Philippines (26%), Vietnam (37%), Lao PDR (4%), and Myanmar (64%), from a societal perspective with a lifetime time horizon. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Principal findings: In base-case analyses, full access compared to current access to snake antivenom in the five countries resulted in a total of 9,362 deaths averted (-59%), 230,075 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted (-59%), and cost savings of 1.3 billion USD (-53%). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of improving access to antivenom found higher outcomes but lower costs in all countries. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses of 1,000 iterations found that 98.1–100% of ICERs were cost-saving. Conclusion/Significance: Improving access to snake antivenom will result in cost-saving for ASEAN countries. Our findings emphasized the importance of further strengthening regional cooperation, investment, and funding to improve the situation of snakebite victims in ASEAN countries. Author summary: In the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, it was estimated that annually there were 242,648 snakebite victims in ASEAN of which 15,909 victims were dead. Despite domestic production of antivenoms in ASEAN countries, not all victims with snakebite envenomings indicated for antivenom received the appropriate or adequate effective dose of antivenom due to insufficient supply and inadequate access to antivenoms. Especially in Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Lao PDR, and Myanmar, where 4–64% of victims who needed antivenoms were treated with antivenoms. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to project the potential economic and clinical impact of improving access to antivenoms when all victims with snakebite envenomings in the five most impacted ASEAN countries were hypothetically treated with geographically appropriate antivenoms. Improving access to snake antivenom to the full level of access compared to the current level in the five ASEAN countries resulted in a total of 9,362 deaths averted (-59%), 230,075 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted (-59%), and cost savings of 1.3 billion USD (-53%). Our study demonstrated improving access to snake antivenom from the current to the full level of access in ASEAN countries is a cost-saving strategy. Our findings emphasized the importance of further strengthening regional cooperation, investment, and funding to improve the situation of snakebite victims in ASEAN countries to reach the ultimate goal where all victims with snakebite envenoming needing antivenom adequately received the geographically appropriate antivenoms.
Suggested Citation
Chanthawat Patikorn & Ahmad Khaldun Ismail & Syafiq Asnawi Zainal Abidin & Iekhsan Othman & Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk & Suthira Taychakhoonavudh, 2022.
"Potential economic and clinical implications of improving access to snake antivenom in five ASEAN countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010915
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010915
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Abdulrazaq G Habib & Mohammed Lamorde & Mahmood M Dalhat & Zaiyad G Habib & Andreas Kuznik, 2015.
"Cost-effectiveness of Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenoming in Nigeria,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
- Muhammad Hamza & Maryam A Idris & Musa B Maiyaki & Mohammed Lamorde & Jean-Philippe Chippaux & David A Warrell & Andreas Kuznik & Abdulrazaq G Habib, 2016.
"Cost-Effectiveness of Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenoming in 16 Countries in West Africa,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Abdulrazaq G Habib & Baba M Musa & Garba Iliyasu & Muhammad Hamza & Andreas Kuznik & Jean-Philippe Chippaux, 2020.
"Challenges and prospects of snake antivenom supply in sub-Saharan Africa,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-10, August.
- Sayem Ahmed & Guibehi B Koudou & Maïwenn Bagot & François Drabo & Windtaré R Bougma & Caisey Pulford & Moses Bockarie & Robert A Harrison, 2021.
"Health and economic burden estimates of snakebite management upon health facilities in three regions of southern Burkina Faso,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
- Muhammad Hamza & Maryam A Idris & Musa B Maiyaki & Mohammed Lamorde & Jean-Philippe Chippaux & David A Warrell & Andreas Kuznik & Abdulrazaq G Habib, 2016.
"Cost-Effectiveness of Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenoming in 16 Countries in West Africa,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.