IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing, validating, and updating machine learning models to predict survival in children with Ebola Virus Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia E Genisca
  • Kelsey Butler
  • Monique Gainey
  • Tzu-Chun Chu
  • Lawrence Huang
  • Eta N Mbong
  • Stephen B Kennedy
  • Razia Laghari
  • Fiston Nganga
  • Rigobert F Muhayangabo
  • Himanshu Vaishnav
  • Shiromi M Perera
  • Moyinoluwa Adeniji
  • Adam C Levine
  • Ian C Michelow
  • Andrés Colubri

Abstract

Background: Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) causes high case fatality rates (CFRs) in young children, yet there are limited data focusing on predicting mortality in pediatric patients. Here we present machine learning-derived prognostic models to predict clinical outcomes in children infected with Ebola virus. Methods: Using retrospective data from the Ebola Data Platform, we investigated children with EVD from the West African EVD outbreak in 2014–2016. Elastic net regularization was used to create a prognostic model for EVD mortality. In addition to external validation with data from the 2018–2020 EVD epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), we updated the model using selected serum biomarkers. Findings: Pediatric EVD mortality was significantly associated with younger age, lower PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, unexplained bleeding, respiratory distress, bone/muscle pain, anorexia, dysphagia, and diarrhea. These variables were combined to develop the newly described EVD Prognosis in Children (EPiC) predictive model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for EPiC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81) in the West Africa derivation dataset and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64–0.88) in the DRC validation dataset. Updating the model with peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or creatinine kinase (CK) measured within the first 48 hours after admission increased the AUC to 0.90 (0.77–1.00) and 0.87 (0.74–1.00), respectively. Conclusion: The novel EPiC prognostic model that incorporates clinical information and commonly used biochemical tests, such as AST and CK, can be used to predict mortality in children with EVD. Author summary: Although case fatality rates remain high, there are limited data on predicting mortality in children with Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). Furthermore, challenges in predicting EVD outcomes using clinical and laboratory data highlight the need for the development and validation of pediatric predictive models. The novel EVD Prognosis in Children (EPiC) model uses clinical and biochemical information, such as AST and CK, to predict mortality in infected children. While few prognostic models or scoring systems have been developed to predict clinical outcomes of EVD, the majority of them were limited in geographical and temporal scope having been derived using data from one location. As such, the EPiC model is the first externally validated model for the prognosis of pediatric EVD using diverse datasets from geographically and temporally separate outbreaks. This model can be easily applied by bedside clinicians to assess pediatric patients at risk for death and help to allocate resources accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia E Genisca & Kelsey Butler & Monique Gainey & Tzu-Chun Chu & Lawrence Huang & Eta N Mbong & Stephen B Kennedy & Razia Laghari & Fiston Nganga & Rigobert F Muhayangabo & Himanshu Vaishnav & Shiro, 2022. "Constructing, validating, and updating machine learning models to predict survival in children with Ebola Virus Disease," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010789
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010789
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010789&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.