IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating economic and disease burden of snakebite in ASEAN countries using a decision analytic model

Author

Listed:
  • Chanthawat Patikorn
  • Jörg Blessmann
  • Myat Thet Nwe
  • Patrick Joseph G Tiglao
  • Taksa Vasaruchapong
  • Tri Maharani
  • Uyen Vy Doan
  • Syafiq Asnawi Zainal Abidin
  • Ahmad Khaldun Ismail
  • Iekhsan Othman
  • Suthira Taychakhoonavudh
  • Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

Abstract

Background: Understanding the burden of snakebite is crucial for developing evidence-informed strategies to pursue the goal set by the World Health Organization to halve morbidity and mortality of snakebite by 2030. However, there was no such information in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. Methodology: A decision analytic model was developed to estimate annual burden of snakebite in seven countries, including Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Lao PDR, and Myanmar. Country-specific input parameters were sought from published literature, country’s Ministry of Health, local data, and expert opinion. Economic burden was estimated from the societal perspective. Costs were expressed in 2019 US Dollars (USD). Disease burden was estimated as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate a 95% credible interval (CrI). Principal findings: We estimated that annually there were 242,648 snakebite victims (95%CrI 209,810–291,023) of which 15,909 (95%CrI 7,592–33,949) were dead and 954 (95%CrI 383–1,797) were amputated. We estimated that 161,835 snakebite victims (69% of victims who were indicated for antivenom treatment) were not treated with antivenom. Annual disease burden of snakebite was estimated at 391,979 DALYs (95%CrI 187,261–836,559 DALYs) with total costs of 2.5 billion USD (95%CrI 1.2–5.4 billion USD) that were equivalent to 0.09% (95%CrI 0.04–0.20%) of the region’s gross domestic product. >95% of the estimated burdens were attributed to premature deaths. Conclusion/Significance: The estimated high burden of snakebite in ASEAN was demonstrated despite the availability of domestically produced antivenoms. Most burdens were attributed to premature deaths from snakebite envenoming which suggested that the remarkably high burden of snakebite could be averted. We emphasized the importance of funding research to perform a comprehensive data collection on epidemiological and economic burden of snakebite to eventually reveal the true burden of snakebite in ASEAN and inform development of strategies to tackle the problem of snakebite. Author summary: In the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, we estimated that annually there were 242,648 snakebite victims of which 15,909 victims were dead and 954 victims were amputated. We estimated that 69% of victims indicated for antivenom treatment were not treated with antivenom. Annual disease burden of snakebite was estimated at 391,979 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) with estimated total costs of snakebite of 2.5 billion US Dollars which were equivalent to 0.09% of the region’s gross domestic product. Almost all of the estimated economic and disease burdens were related to deaths from snakebite envenoming which suggested that the remarkably high burden of snakebite could actually be averted. We emphasized the importance of funding research to perform a comprehensive data collection on epidemiological and economic burden of snakebite to eventually reveal the true burden of snakebite in ASEAN and inform development of strategies to tackle the problem of snakebite.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanthawat Patikorn & Jörg Blessmann & Myat Thet Nwe & Patrick Joseph G Tiglao & Taksa Vasaruchapong & Tri Maharani & Uyen Vy Doan & Syafiq Asnawi Zainal Abidin & Ahmad Khaldun Ismail & Iekhsan Othman, 2022. "Estimating economic and disease burden of snakebite in ASEAN countries using a decision analytic model," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010775
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010775
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010775&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.