IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape analysis of NTD diagnostics and considerations on the development of a strategy for regulatory pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Hye Lynn Choi
  • Camilla Ducker
  • Susie Braniff
  • Daniel Argaw
  • Anthony W Solomon
  • Bettina Borisch
  • Deusdedit Mubangizi

Abstract

Access to quality-assured, accurate diagnostics is critical to ensure that the 2021–2030 neglected tropical disease (NTD) road map targets can be achieved. Currently, however, there is limited regulatory oversight and few quality assurance mechanisms for NTD diagnostic tools. In attempting to address such challenges and the changing environment in regulatory requirements for diagnostics, a landscape analysis was conducted, to better understand the availability of NTD diagnostics and inform future regulatory frameworks. The list of commercially available diagnostics was compiled from various sources, including WHO guidance, national guidelines for case detection and management, diagnostic target product profiles and the published literature. The inventory was analyzed according to diagnostic type, intended use, regulatory status, and risk classification. To estimate the global need and size of the market for each type of diagnostic, annual procurement data were collected from WHO, procurement agencies, NGOs and international organizations, where available and global disease prevalence. Expert interviews were also conducted to ensure a better understanding of how diagnostics are procured and used. Of 125 diagnostic tools included in this analysis, rapid diagnostic tools accounted for 33% of diagnostics used for NTDs and very few diagnostics had been subjected to regulatory assessment. The number of tests needed for each disease was less than 1 million units per annum, except in the case of two diseases, suggesting limited commercial value. Despite the nature of the market, and presumed insufficient return on commercial investment, acceptable levels of assurance on performance, quality and safety of diagnostics are still required. Priority actions include setting up an agile, interim, stepwise risk assessment mechanism, in particular for diagnostics of lower risk, in order to support national NTD programmes and their partners with the selection and procurement of the diagnostics needed to control, eliminate and eradicate NTDs.Author summary: Rapidly evolving landscape of in-vitro diagnostics is posing quality assurance challenges for manufacturers and regulators as well as creating product selection dilemmas for procurers, donors, and national programmes. In attempting to address such challenges, a landscape analysis of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) diagnostics was conducted to provide insights for all stakeholders to support a future regulatory framework for NTD diagnostics. The inventory of commercially available diagnostics was compiled and analyzed and the global need and size of the market for each type of diagnostic was estimated. The results showed low commercial value and limited regulatory oversight on NTD diagnostics. Despite the insufficient return on commercial investment, reasonable assurance of product safety, performance and quality is required. One of the priorities is to establish a risk assessment mechanism, in particular for NTD diagnostics of lower risk, in order to support national NTD programmes, procurement agencies, donors and other partners with the selection and procurement of the diagnostics needed to achieve the 2021–2030 NTD road map targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Hye Lynn Choi & Camilla Ducker & Susie Braniff & Daniel Argaw & Anthony W Solomon & Bettina Borisch & Deusdedit Mubangizi, 2022. "Landscape analysis of NTD diagnostics and considerations on the development of a strategy for regulatory pathways," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010597
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010597
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010597&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth A Ochola & Diana M S Karanja & Susan J Elliott, 2021. "The impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) on health and wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A case study of Kenya," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Elizabeth A. Ochola & Susan J. Elliott & Diana M. S. Karanja, 2021. "The Impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) on Women’s Health and Wellbeing in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A Case Study of Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin Binns & Mi Kyung Lee & Lyn Wren, 2022. "The Broad Spectrum and Continuing Needs of Women’s Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.