Author
Listed:
- Leo Wood
- Cecilia Ngari
- Stanley Parkurito
- Kieran Barnes
- Denis Otundo
- Daniel Asiago Misiani
- Geoffrey Maranga Kephah
- Anna Trelfa
- George O Olouch
- Robert A Harrison
- Frank-Leonel Tianyi
Abstract
Introduction: Human-snake interactions are common in tropical regions where subsistence-farming and livestock-herding activities predominate alongside proliferation of snakes. Local beliefs and perceptions about snakes and snakebites influence human behaviour. Understanding these beliefs and perceptions can inform the development of resources to drive behaviour change and to minimise the risk of injury to both humans and snakes. This qualitative study, conducted between May and July 2019, sought to explore the beliefs and perceptions regarding snakes and snakebites, and methods of prevention and management among members of the community in Kitui County, Kenya. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were used to collect qualitative data from 23 participants, recruited using a stratified purposeful sampling strategy in four selected sub-counties of Kitui county. Interview data was anonymised and coded and a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12. Results: People from Kitui county mostly had negative perceptions about snakes. There was a generalised awareness of the need to prevent snakebite, predominantly through keeping snakes away from homes/compounds. However, implementation was limited by financial constraints. Participants also identified logistic and financial obstacles to early hospital presentation following a snakebite, and they expressed a strong preference of having their snakebites treated in a hospital over consulting traditional healers. There was a universal recognition of the benefit of early intervention with a specific appreciation of the utility of the black stone. Furthermore, the removal of a snake’s “teeth” was an expected treatment outcome for some community members, with the failure to do so perceived as causing poor wound healing or persistence of symptoms. Some religious groups held views which differed from most participants. Conclusion: There is a need to explore and clarify common misconceptions about snakes and first aid treatment of snakebites, encourage learning about the true nature of snakes, and highlight beneficial uses of snakes. A change in the epistemological conception of community education material by enhancing the value and use of local forms of knowledge, and the employment of art techniques to transmit this knowledge, could improve community perception and methods of snakebite prevention. Patient expectations should be appropriately managed by discussing possible outcomes, incorporating follow-up visits and addressing long-term complications of snakebites. Author summary: Snakebites mostly affect rural communities living in tropical regions. The beliefs and perceptions of these rural inhabitants on snakes and snakebites could inform the development of resources to minimise the risk of injury to humans and snakes. However, few studies have investigated how rural communities perceive snakes and snakebites, and the beliefs that drive these perceptions. We conducted interviews with members of the community in Kitui county, to explore the beliefs and perceptions regarding snakes and snakebites and methods of prevention and management. Negative perceptions were common, and there was a generalised awareness to prevent snakebite by keeping snakes away from homes/compounds. There was a preference for hospital treatment of snakebite, but this was limited by logistic and financial obstacles to early hospital presentation. Most inhabitants used the black stone before seeking health care, and there was an expectation for the snake’s ‘teeth’ to fall out of the wound for complete healing to occur. Our findings highlight a need to explore and clarify common misconceptions about snakes and first aid treatment of snakebites, and to improve community perceptions using locally developed forms of knowledge, and employment of art techniques such as music and dance.
Suggested Citation
Leo Wood & Cecilia Ngari & Stanley Parkurito & Kieran Barnes & Denis Otundo & Daniel Asiago Misiani & Geoffrey Maranga Kephah & Anna Trelfa & George O Olouch & Robert A Harrison & Frank-Leonel Tianyi, 2022.
"“Then they prayed, they did nothing else, they just prayed for the boy and he was well”: A qualitative investigation into the perceptions and behaviours surrounding snakebite and its management in rur,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010579
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010579
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Sara Babo Martins & Isabelle Bolon & François Chappuis & Nicolas Ray & Gabriel Alcoba & Carlos Ochoa & Sanjib Kumar Sharma & Armand S Nkwescheu & Franck Wanda & Andrew M Durso & Rafael Ruiz de Castañe, 2019.
"Snakebite and its impact in rural communities: The need for a One Health approach,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-4, September.
- Julia Elizabeth Isaacson & Jinny Jing Ye & Lincoln Luís Silva & Thiago Augusto Hernandes Rocha & Luciano de Andrade & Joao Felipe Hermann Costa Scheidt & Fan Hui Wen & Jacqueline Sachett & Wuelton Mar, 2023.
"Antivenom access impacts severity of Brazilian snakebite envenoming: A geographic information system analysis,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.