IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human rights as a framework for eliminating female genital schistosomiasis

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlin R Williams
  • Maximillian Seunik
  • Benjamin Mason Meier

Abstract

Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) affects tens of millions of women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa, yet this inequitable threat is often overlooked by advocates in both the neglected tropical disease (NTD) and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) communities. FGS causes both acute infection and long-term sexual and reproductive health harm to marginalized women and girls, with gender, poverty, and rurality combining to invisibilize the disease. Human rights and gender imperatives can help to galvanize efforts to control and eliminate FGS, as they have for other NTDs. Specifically, international human rights obligations can frame state efforts to address FGS across healthcare settings, upstream social determinants of health, scientific research, and policy implementation. This article analyzes human rights–based approaches to FGS control and elimination efforts, outlining several areas for forward-looking reforms to health policy, programing, and practice. Building from the lessons learned in applying human rights–based approaches to advance progress on other NTDs, this analysis seeks to provide the NTD community with shared understanding around international legal obligations to engage SRHR advocates and draw heightened attention to FGS. Such human rights–based approaches to FGS control and elimination can help to reduce stigma and improve care for the millions of women and girls currently affected by this preventable disease.Author summary: Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) affects over 56 million women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa alone, yet this inequitable threat is largely ignored by global health advocates, program managers, and policymakers. The lack of international attention undermines efforts to eliminate schistosomiasis globally. International human rights law can help to reverse this neglect and shape the role of the international community in supporting elimination of FGS as a public health problem, as has been done for other neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). This analysis provides the NTD community with shared language around international legal obligations to engage sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) advocates and draw attention to this often overlooked condition. Working together, these two communities can reduce stigma and improve the health and well-being of the millions of marginalized women and girls affected by this preventable disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlin R Williams & Maximillian Seunik & Benjamin Mason Meier, 2022. "Human rights as a framework for eliminating female genital schistosomiasis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-9, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010165
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010165
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010165&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.