IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mouse models of Japanese encephalitis virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a meta-regression approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tehmina Bharucha
  • Ben Cleary
  • Alice Farmiloe
  • Elizabeth Sutton
  • Hanifah Hayati
  • Peggy Kirkwood
  • Layal Al Hamed
  • Nadja van Ginneken
  • Krishanthi S Subramaniam
  • Nicole Zitzmann
  • Gerry Davies
  • Lance Turtle

Abstract

Background: Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus (JEV) remains a leading cause of neurological infection across Asia. The high lethality of disease and absence of effective therapies mean that standardised animal models will be crucial in developing therapeutics. However, published mouse models are heterogeneous. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of published JEV mouse experiments to investigate the variation in model parameters, assess homogeneity and test the relationship of key variables against mortality. Methodology/ Principal findings: A PubMed search was performed up to August 2020. 1991 publications were identified, of which 127 met inclusion criteria, with data for 5026 individual mice across 487 experimental groups. Quality assessment was performed using a modified CAMARADES criteria and demonstrated incomplete reporting with a median quality score of 10/17. The pooled estimate of mortality in mice after JEV challenge was 64.7% (95% confidence interval 60.9 to 68.3) with substantial heterogeneity between experimental groups (I^2 70.1%, df 486). Using meta-regression to identify key moderators, a refined dataset was used to model outcome dependent on five variables: mouse age, mouse strain, virus strain, virus dose (in log10PFU) and route of inoculation. The final model reduced the heterogeneity substantially (I^2 38.9, df 265%, df 241), explaining 54% of the variability. Conclusion/ Significance: This is the first systematic review of mouse models of JEV infection. Better adherence to CAMARADES guidelines may reduce bias and variability of reporting. In particular, sample size calculations were notably absent. We report that mouse age, mouse strain, virus strain, virus dose and route of inoculation account for much, though not all, of the variation in mortality. This dataset is available for researchers to access and use as a guideline for JEV mouse experiments. Author summary: Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus (JEV) remains a leading cause of brain infection across Asia, resulting in considerable death and disability. No effective treatment exists. Mouse models are fundamental to evaluate novel treatments. We aimed to perform the first systematic literature review and data synthesis of JEV infection in mouse models. We identified an abundance of experimental data in the field, with 127 studies meeting the inclusion criteria involving a total of 5026 individual mice. Overall, 64.7% of mice died after JEV infection. However, there was incomplete reporting in publications and considerable variability in the results. In summary, the findings support the ongoing use of mouse models of JEV infection and inform researchers in the field in refining their experiments. Key factors affecting variation in mortality across studies that need to be carefully considered in study design are mouse age, mouse strain, virus strain, virus dose and route of inoculation. We highlight the need for researchers to adhere to reporting guidelines in preparing manuscripts for publication.

Suggested Citation

  • Tehmina Bharucha & Ben Cleary & Alice Farmiloe & Elizabeth Sutton & Hanifah Hayati & Peggy Kirkwood & Layal Al Hamed & Nadja van Ginneken & Krishanthi S Subramaniam & Nicole Zitzmann & Gerry Davies & , 2022. "Mouse models of Japanese encephalitis virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a meta-regression approach," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010116
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010116&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.