IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementer and recipient perspectives of community-wide mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths in Kwale County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Legge
  • Stella Kepha
  • Mateo Prochazka
  • Katherine Halliday
  • Rachel Pullan
  • Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore
  • Doris Njomo

Abstract

Soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) are one of 17 neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) earmarked for control or elimination by 2020 in the WHO’s Roadmap on NTDs. Deworming programs for STH have thus far been focused on treating pre-school and school-aged children; however, there is a growing consensus that to achieve elimination of STH transmission, programs must also target adults, potentially through community-wide mass drug administration (MDA). There is currently a gap in the literature on what components are required to deliver community-wide MDA for STH in order to achieve high intervention reach and uptake. Nested within the TUMIKIA Project, a cluster randomized trial in Kenya evaluating the effectiveness of school-based deworming versus community-wide MDA, we collected qualitative data from program implementers and recipients in eight clusters where community-wide MDA was delivered. Data collection included semi-structured in-depth interviews (n = 72) and focus group discussions (n = 32). A conceptual framework for drug distribution was constructed to help build an analysis codebook. Case memos were developed for each top-level theme. Community-wide MDA for STH was perceived as a complex intervention with key administrative and social mobilization domains. Key actionable themes included: (1) developing an efficient strategy to allocate reasonable workload for implementers to cover all targeted households; (2) maximizing community drug distributors’ motivation through promoting belief in the effectiveness of the intervention and providing sufficient financial incentives; (3) developing effective capacity building strategies for implementers; and (4) implementing a context-adapted community engagement strategy that leverages existing community structures and takes into consideration past community experiences of MDAs. Transitioning from STH control to elimination goals requires significant planning and action to ensure community-wide MDA is delivered with sufficient reach and uptake. We present findings that can inform national deworming programs to increase intervention delivery capacity.Author summary: Infections by soil-transmitted worms are common in tropical and subtropical areas. Control strategies usually involve distributing deworming drugs to children, who are most affected. However, recent evidence suggests that distributing these drugs to whole communities, including adults, might help to achieve the elimination of these worms as a public health problem. As part of a large trial in Kenya evaluating the distribution of deworming drugs to communities, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the perspectives of drug delivery among drug distributors and recipient communities. We conducted and analyzed in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. For community deworming to be implemented well, it requires distributors to be highly motivated and follow a plan that fits well with the characteristics of the target community. In order to accept the deworming drugs, communities need to know about the health problem and the intervention, and trust the delivery system. These findings should prove useful to national deworming programs planning to distribute drugs to whole communities when developing their delivery strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Legge & Stella Kepha & Mateo Prochazka & Katherine Halliday & Rachel Pullan & Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore & Doris Njomo, 2020. "Implementer and recipient perspectives of community-wide mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths in Kwale County, Kenya," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008258
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008258&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doris W Njomo & Dunstan A Mukoko & Nipher K Nyamongo & Joan Karanja, 2014. "Increasing Coverage in Mass Drug Administration for Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination in an Urban Setting: a Study of Malindi Town, Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Alison Krentel & Margaret Gyapong & Shruti Mallya & Nana Yaa Boadu & Mary Amuyunzu-Nyamongo & Mariana Stephens & Deborah A McFarland, 2017. "Review of the factors influencing the motivation of community drug distributors towards the control and elimination of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs)," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Folahanmi T. Akinsolu & Priscilla O. Nemieboka & Diana W. Njuguna & Makafui N. Ahadji & Dora Dezso & Orsolya Varga, 2019. "Emerging Resistance of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Scoping Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.