IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0007329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The spatial epidemiology of leprosy in Kenya: A retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Fatihiyya Wangara
  • Hillary Kipruto
  • Oscar Ngesa
  • James Kayima
  • Enos Masini
  • Joseph Sitienei
  • Faith Ngari

Abstract

Background: Leprosy elimination defined as a registered prevalence rate of less than 1 case per 10,000 persons was achieved in Kenya at the national level in 1989. However, there are still pockets of leprosy in some counties where late diagnosis and consequent physical disability persist. The epidemiology of leprosy in Kenya for the period 2012 through to 2015 was defined using spatial methods. Methods: This was a retrospective ecological correlational study that utilized leprosy case based data extracted from the National Leprosy Control Program database. Geographic information system and demographic data were obtained from Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). Chi square tests were carried out to check for association between sociodemographic factors and disease indicators. Two Spatial Poisson Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models were fitted in WinBUGS 1.4 software. The first model included all leprosy cases (new, retreatment, transfers from another health facility) and the second one included only new leprosy cases. These models were used to estimate leprosy relative risks per county as compared to the whole country i.e. the risk of presenting with leprosy given the geographical location. Principal findings: Children aged less than 15 years accounted for 7.5% of all leprosy cases indicating active leprosy transmission in Kenya. The risk of leprosy notification increased by about 5% for every 1 year increase in age, whereas a 1% increase in the proportion of MB cases increased the chances of new leprosy case notification by 4%. When compared to the whole country, counties with the highest risk of leprosy include Kwale (relative risk of 15), Kilifi (RR;8.9) and Homabay (RR;4.1), whereas Turkana had the lowest relative risk of 0.005. Conclusion: Leprosy incidence exhibits geographical variation and there is need to institute tailored local control measures in these areas to reduce the burden of disability. Author summary: Leprosy is a chronic bacterial disease that mainly affects the nerves. If untreated, it may cause progressive and permanent damage to the skin, nerves, limbs, and eyes leading to physical disability. Through use of a combination of drugs, Kenya was able to declare the disease as eliminated in the year 1989. However, there are still pockets of leprosy in some Kenyan counties where physical disability persists, mainly due to late diagnosis. To be able to curb this disease, control measures must be intensified, especially in the counties reporting more cases. We used data of the leprosy cases reported in Kenya for the period 2012 through to 2015 in order to describe geographical variation and factors influencing this variation. More than half of the registered cases had visible physical disability. The risk of leprosy notification increased with an increase in age as well as the severity of disease. We estimated that people living in Kwale, Kilifi and Homabay counties are 15, 9, and 5 times respectively more at risk of leprosy as compared to the whole country. Given the limited resources, it’s therefore paramount that high risk counties be initially targeted for control, with a focus on early diagnosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatihiyya Wangara & Hillary Kipruto & Oscar Ngesa & James Kayima & Enos Masini & Joseph Sitienei & Faith Ngari, 2019. "The spatial epidemiology of leprosy in Kenya: A retrospective study," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007329
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007329&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.