IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0007253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Topical paromomycin for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis

Author

Listed:
  • Néstor Sosa
  • Juan Miguel Pascale
  • Ana I Jiménez
  • Jeanne A Norwood
  • Mara Kreishman-Detrick
  • Peter J Weina
  • Kendra Lawrence
  • William F McCarthy
  • Ryan C Adams
  • Charles Scott
  • Janet Ransom
  • Douglas Tang
  • Max Grogl

Abstract

Background: Paromomycin-based topical treatments were shown to be effective in curing cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) lesions caused by Leishmania major in Tunisia. Cure rates of an index lesion were approximately 80%. As a follow on, we conducted a similar Phase 3 trial in Panama to demonstrate the efficacy of these treatments against New World species. The primary objective was to determine if a combination topical cream (paromomycin-gentamicin) resulted in statistically superior final clinical cure rates of an index lesion compared to a paromomycin alone topical cream for the treatment of CL, primarily caused by Leishmania panamensis. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double blind, Phase 3 trial of topical creams for the treatment of CL caused by Leishmania spp. Three hundred ninety nine patients with one to ten CL lesions were treated by topical application once daily for 20 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of subjects with clinical cure of an index lesion confirmed to contain Leishmania with no relapse. Results: The clinical cure of the index lesion for paromomycin-gentamicin was 79% (95% CI; 72 to 84) and for paromomycin alone was 78% (95% CI; 74 to 87) (p = 0.84). The most common adverse events considered related to study cream application were mild to moderate dermatitis, pain, and pruritus. Conclusions: Superiority of paromomycin-gentamicin was not demonstrated. However, the approximately 80% cure rates for both topical creams were similar to those demonstrated in Tunisia and previously reported with parenteral antimonials. Author summary: Leishmaniasis, a neglected parasitic infection transmitted by the bite of a female sand fly, is endemic in 98 countries or territories with approximately 0.7 to 1.2 million cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) cases occurring each year. In Panama, most of the CL cases are caused by L. panamensis and, the first line of treatment is pentavalent antimony, given parenterally for 20 days. These systemic regimen is associated with toxicities that can limit the patient from receiving a full course of treatment. Alternative therapies are needed particularly for patients with mild disease, no mucosal involvement, no immunosuppression, and for patients living in areas with scarce infrastructure. Therefore, less toxic, non-parenteral new therapies against CL are urgently needed. We conducted a comparative clinical study that evaluated Paromomycin topical creams (Paromomycin alone versus Paromomycin+Gentamicin) for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 399) in three sites of country. Our study demonstrated the efficacy of these preparations against New World leishmanial species (mostly L. panamensis) with a cure rate close to 80%.

Suggested Citation

  • Néstor Sosa & Juan Miguel Pascale & Ana I Jiménez & Jeanne A Norwood & Mara Kreishman-Detrick & Peter J Weina & Kendra Lawrence & William F McCarthy & Ryan C Adams & Charles Scott & Janet Ransom & Dou, 2019. "Topical paromomycin for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007253
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007253&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.