IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0006810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial distribution of Taenia solium exposure in humans and pigs in the Central Highlands of Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Dinh Ng-Nguyen
  • Rebecca Justine Traub
  • Van-Anh Thi Nguyen
  • Kathleen Breen
  • Mark Anthony Stevenson

Abstract

Background: Taenia solium, a pork-borne parasitic zoonosis, is the cause of taeniasis and cysticercosis in humans. In Vietnam, poor sanitation, the practice of outdoor defecation and consumption of raw/undercooked pork have been associated with infection/exposure to T. solium in both humans and pigs. The broad-scale geographic distribution of the prevalence of T. solium varies throughout the country with infection restricted to isolated foci in the north and a more sporadic geographic distribution in the Central Highlands and the south. While cross-sectional studies have allowed the broad-scale geographic distribution of T. solium to be described, details of the geographic distribution of T. solium at finer spatial scales have not been described in detail. This study provides a descriptive spatial analysis of T. solium exposure in humans and pigs and T. solium taeniasis in humans within individual households in village communities of Dak Lak in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Methodology/Principal findings: We used Ripley’s K-function to describe spatial dependence in T. solium exposure positive and negative human and pig households and T. solium taeniasis exposure positive and negative households in villages within the districts of Buon Don, Krong Nang and M’Drak of Dak Lak province in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. The prevalence of exposure to T. solium in pigs in Dak Lak province was 9 (95% CI 5 to 17) cases per 1000 pigs at risk. The prevalence of exposure to the parasite in humans was somewhat higher at 5 (95% CI 3 to 8) cases per 100 individuals at risk. Spatial aggregations of T. solium exposure-positive pig and human households occurred in some, but not all of the villages in the three study districts. Human exposure-positive households were found to be aggregated within a distance of 200 to 300 m in villages in Krong Nang district compared with distances of up to 1500 m for pig exposure-positive households in villages in M’Drak district. Although this study demonstrated the aggregation of households in which either T. solium exposure- or taeniasis-positive individuals were present, we were unable to identify an association between the two due to the very low number of T. solium taeniasis-positive households. Conclusions: Spatial aggregations of T. solium exposure-positive pig and human households occurred in some, but not all of the villages in the three study districts. We were unable to definitively identify reasons for these findings but speculate that they were due to a combination of demographic, anthropological and micro-environmental factors. To more definitively identify characteristics that increase cysticercosis risk we propose that cross-sectional studies similar in design to that described in this paper should be applied in other provinces of Vietnam. Author summary: Taenia solium is a pork-bone zoonotic parasite. Humans acquire taeniasis from consumption of raw/undercooked pork contaminated with T. solium cysticerci. Pigs and humans acquire cysticercosis following consumption of food contaminated with eggs shed from the feces of humans with T. solium taeniasis. In Vietnam, the geographic distribution of T. solium varies throughout the country with hotspots or foci of infection in communities in the North and a more sporadic distribution in the Central Highlands and the South. While information on the distribution at the regional and provincial level is available, there is no available information on the spatial distribution of T. solium at fine spatial scales and factors influencing its distribution at fine spatial scales have not been described in detail. In this cross-sectional study, we collected information on the geographic coordinates of study households and utilized spatial analytical techniques to quantify both the fine scale spatial pattern of exposure to T. solium as well as the tendency for T. solium exposure-positive households to be located close to other T. solium exposure-positive households (spatial autocorrelation) in three districts in Dak Lak province. We found that in some of the study villages T. solium exposure-positive households were more likely to be surrounded by other T. solium exposure-positive households. Human exposure-positive households were found to be aggregated within a distance of 200 to 300 m in villages in Krong Nang district; whilst spatial aggregation of pig exposure-positive households was found up to distances of 1500 m in villages in M’Drak district. Although households that had either T. solium exposure- or taeniasis-positive cases were aggregated, we were unable to quantify their spatial association due to the extremely low number of T. solium taeniasis-positive households. This study shows that in the Central Highlands of Vietnam, T. solium exposure tend to cluster within foci. This information can be used to inform community intervention programs to lower its incidence in both humans and pigs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinh Ng-Nguyen & Rebecca Justine Traub & Van-Anh Thi Nguyen & Kathleen Breen & Mark Anthony Stevenson, 2018. "Spatial distribution of Taenia solium exposure in humans and pigs in the Central Highlands of Vietnam," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006810
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006810
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006810&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.