IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0002708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pilot Assessment of Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in the Context of Transmission Assessment Surveys for Lymphatic Filariasis in Benin and Tonga

Author

Listed:
  • Brian K Chu
  • Katherine Gass
  • Wilfrid Batcho
  • Malakai 'Ake
  • Améyo M Dorkenoo
  • Elvire Adjinacou
  • 'Eva Mafi
  • David G Addiss

Abstract

Background: Mass drug administration (MDA) for lymphatic filariasis (LF) programs has delivered more than 2 billion treatments of albendazole, in combination with either ivermectin or diethylcarbamazine, to communities co-endemic for soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), reducing the prevalence of both diseases. A transmission assessment survey (TAS) is recommended to determine if MDA for LF can be stopped within an evaluation unit (EU) after at least five rounds of annual treatment. The TAS also provides an opportunity to simultaneously assess the impact of these MDAs on STH and to determine the frequency of school-based MDA for STH after community-wide MDA is no longer needed for LF. Methodology/Principal Findings: Pilot studies conducted in Benin and Tonga assessed the feasibility of a coordinated approach. Of the schools (clusters) selected for a TAS in each EU, a subset of 5 schools per STH ecological zone was randomly selected, according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, for the coordinated survey. In Benin, 519 children were sampled in 5 schools and 22 (4.2%) had STH infection (A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, or hookworm) detected using the Kato-Katz method. All infections were classified as light intensity under WHO criteria. In Tonga, 10 schools were chosen for the coordinated TAS and STH survey covering two ecological zones; 32 of 232 (13.8%) children were infected in Tongatapu and 82 of 320 (25.6%) in Vava'u and Ha'apai. All infections were light-intensity with the exception of one with moderate-intensity T. trichiura. Conclusions: Synchronous assessment of STH with TAS is feasible and provides a well-timed evaluation of infection prevalence to guide ongoing treatment decisions at a time when MDA for LF may be stopped. The coordinated field experiences in both countries also suggest potential time and cost savings. Refinement of a coordinated TAS and STH sampling methodology should be pursued, along with further validation of alternative quantitative diagnostic tests for STH that can be used with preserved stool specimens. Author Summary: Since 2000, some 2 billion preventive chemotherapy treatments have been delivered for lymphatic filariasis (LF), many in areas co-endemic for soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH). A transmission assessment survey (TAS) is recommended to determine if such ‘mass drug administration (MDA)’ for LF can be stopped in a specified evaluation unit. The TAS also provides an opportune platform to simultaneously conduct STH assessments and make informed programmatic decisions about STH control. Through piloting this coordinated TAS and STH survey approach in Benin and Tonga, we found that after 5–6 rounds of annual MDA, STH prevalence was 4.2% in Benin and 13.8–25.6% in Tonga. All infections were light intensity except one moderate A. lumbricoides case in Tonga. Our study highlights that a coordinated strategy is operationally feasible, programmatically relevant, and potentially cost-effective. A more robust sampling methodology for coordinated TAS and STH surveys should be further explored, as well as alternative diagnostic tests for STH.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian K Chu & Katherine Gass & Wilfrid Batcho & Malakai 'Ake & Améyo M Dorkenoo & Elvire Adjinacou & 'Eva Mafi & David G Addiss, 2014. "Pilot Assessment of Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in the Context of Transmission Assessment Surveys for Lymphatic Filariasis in Benin and Tonga," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0002708
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0002708
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0002708&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0002708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.