IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0001716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prophylactic Platelets in Dengue: Survey Responses Highlight Lack of an Evidence Base

Author

Listed:
  • James Whitehorn
  • Rosmari Rodriguez Roche
  • Maria G Guzman
  • Eric Martinez
  • Wilmar Villamil Gomez
  • Leonard Nainggolan
  • Ida Safitri Laksono
  • Ajay Mishra
  • Lucy Lum
  • Abul Faiz
  • Amadou Sall
  • Joshua Dawurung
  • Alvaro Borges
  • Yee-Sin Leo
  • Lucille Blumberg
  • Daniel G Bausch
  • Axel Kroeger
  • Olaf Horstick
  • Guy Thwaites
  • Heiman Wertheim
  • Mattias Larsson
  • Tran Tinh Hien
  • Rosanna Peeling
  • Bridget Wills
  • Cameron Simmons
  • Jeremy Farrar

Abstract

Dengue is the most important arboviral infection of humans. Thrombocytopenia is frequently observed in the course of infection and haemorrhage may occur in severe disease. The degree of thrombocytopenia correlates with the severity of infection, and may contribute to the risk of haemorrhage. As a result of this prophylactic platelet transfusions are sometimes advocated for the prevention of haemorrhage. There is currently no evidence to support this practice, and platelet transfusions are costly and sometimes harmful. We conducted a global survey to assess the different approaches to the use of platelets in dengue. Respondents were all physicians involved with the treatment of patients with dengue. Respondents were asked that their answers reflected what they would do if they were the treating physician. We received responses from 306 physicians from 20 different countries. The heterogeneity of the responses highlights the variation in clinical practice and lack of an evidence base in this area and underscores the importance of prospective clinical trials to address this key question in the clinical management of patients with dengue. Author Summary: A low platelet count is a common feature of dengue infection. It is thought that the platelet count correlates with the severity of the infection and may contribute to the risk of developing haemorrhage, a well-recognised complication of dengue. As a result of this platelet transfusions are used in some settings to reduce the risk of haemorrhage. There is currently no evidence to support this practice, and platelet transfusions are costly and sometimes harmful. We conducted a survey assessing the use of platelets in dengue. Respondents were all physicians involved with the treatment of patients with dengue. Respondents were asked that their answers reflected what they would do if they were the treating physician. We received 306 responses from 20 different countries. The striking feature of the survey responses was the heterogeneity of approaches to the use of platelets in dengue. These findings highlight the variation in clinical practice and lack of an evidence base in this area and underscore the importance of conducting prospective clinical trials to address this key question in dengue clinical management.

Suggested Citation

  • James Whitehorn & Rosmari Rodriguez Roche & Maria G Guzman & Eric Martinez & Wilmar Villamil Gomez & Leonard Nainggolan & Ida Safitri Laksono & Ajay Mishra & Lucy Lum & Abul Faiz & Amadou Sall & Joshu, 2012. "Prophylactic Platelets in Dengue: Survey Responses Highlight Lack of an Evidence Base," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-3, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0001716
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001716
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001716&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0001716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.