IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0000336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Costs of Preventing and Treating Chagas Disease in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Marianela Castillo-Riquelme
  • Felipe Guhl
  • Brenda Turriago
  • Nestor Pinto
  • Fernando Rosas
  • Mónica Flórez Martínez
  • Julia Fox-Rushby
  • Clive Davies
  • Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to report the costs of Chagas disease in Colombia, in terms of vector disease control programmes and the costs of providing care to chronic Chagas disease patients with cardiomyopathy. Methods: Data were collected from Colombia in 2004. A retrospective review of costs for vector control programmes carried out in rural areas included 3,084 houses surveyed for infestation with triatomine bugs and 3,305 houses sprayed with insecticide. A total of 63 patient records from 3 different hospitals were selected for a retrospective review of resource use. Consensus methodology with local experts was used to estimate care seeking behaviour and to complement observed data on utilisation. Findings: The mean cost per house per entomological survey was $4.4 (in US$ of 2004), whereas the mean cost of spraying a house with insecticide was $27. The main cost driver of spraying was the price of the insecticide, which varied greatly. Treatment of a chronic Chagas disease patient costs between $46.4 and $7,981 per year in Colombia, depending on severity and the level of care used. Combining cost and utilisation estimates the expected cost of treatment per patient-year is $1,028, whereas lifetime costs averaged $11,619 per patient. Chronic Chagas disease patients have limited access to healthcare, with an estimated 22% of patients never seeking care. Conclusion: Chagas disease is a preventable condition that affects mostly poor populations living in rural areas. The mean costs of surveying houses for infestation and spraying infested houses were low in comparison to other studies and in line with treatment costs. Care seeking behaviour and the type of insurance affiliation seem to play a role in the facilities and type of care that patients use, thus raising concerns about equitable access to care. Preventing Chagas disease in Colombia would be cost-effective and could contribute to prevent inequalities in health and healthcare. Author Summary: Chagas disease is one of the most important vector-transmitted diseases in Latin America. Many patients with Chagas go undiagnosed for years, and because symptoms of the chronic condition are similar to those of other cardiac conditions, the burden of the disease is not evident. This leads to underestimation of the burden that Chagas disease places on healthcare resources, which in many cases translates into inadequate prioritisation for prevention. This study assessed the cost of Chagas disease in Colombia in comparison to the cost of prevention. Measuring the cost of treatment for Chagas disease is challenging. In this study we used a method that combines retrospective review of costs for prevention activities and for treatment of chronic Chagas disease patients, and we estimated utilisation of services using experts' consensus. We found that the cost of treating Chagas disease is substantial, even though many people are not receiving appropriate care. On the other hand, we show that preventing Chagas disease transmission through insecticide spraying activities is affordable in Colombia and therefore should be conducted more systematically. This study provides the basic inputs to conduct a full economic evaluation of Chagas disease prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Marianela Castillo-Riquelme & Felipe Guhl & Brenda Turriago & Nestor Pinto & Fernando Rosas & Mónica Flórez Martínez & Julia Fox-Rushby & Clive Davies & Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, 2008. "The Costs of Preventing and Treating Chagas Disease in Colombia," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0000336
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0000336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0000336&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0000336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.