Author
Listed:
- Phillip M Hughes
- Joshua D Niznik
- Robert E McGrath
- Casey R Tak
- Robert B Christian
- Betsy L Sleath
- Kathleen C Thomas
Abstract
This study aimed to assess differences in the rates of deprescribing between prescribing psychologists, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians. MarketScan private insurance claims were used to develop a longitudinal active-comparator, prevalent-user cohort of patients who were treated with a psychotropic medication from psychologists, psychiatrists, or primary care physicians for at least 90 days in New Mexico or Louisiana (states where psychologists can prescribe) between 2005–2021. The type of provider (psychologist, psychiatrist, or primary care physicians) who prescribed the psychotropic medication was the exposure of interest. Three measures of deprescribing were used as outcomes: deprescribing without replacement, complete discontinuation of prescribing, or a sustained reduction in the prescribed days’ supply. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics during the six months prior to their initial prescription were measured as covariates. Inverse propensity of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between provider groups, creating two weighted analytic cohorts with covariate balance: psychologists versus psychiatrists and psychologists versus primary care physicians. We estimated doubly-robust Cox Proportional Hazards models for each deprescribing measure in both cohorts. Prescribing psychologists deprescribed without replacement more than psychiatrists (Hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.13 [1.06, 1.20]) and less than primary care physicians (0.73 [0.69, 0.78]). Conversely, they reduced the days’ supply less often than psychiatrists (0.79 [0.69, 0.91]) and more than primary care physicians (1.64 [1.42, 1.90]). There were no differences in complete discontinuation between provider types. Prescribing psychologists deprescribe at a rate between psychiatrists and primary care physicians. Findings varied depending on the deprescribing measure used, suggesting psychotropic-specific deprescribing measures are needed.
Suggested Citation
Phillip M Hughes & Joshua D Niznik & Robert E McGrath & Casey R Tak & Robert B Christian & Betsy L Sleath & Kathleen C Thomas, 2025.
"Psychotropic deprescribing across different prescribing professions in New Mexico and Louisiana,"
PLOS Mental Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmen00:0000408
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000408
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmen00:0000408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: mentalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.