IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmen00/0000228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving recognition of common mental health disorders in Cambodia: Validation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and development of a brief mental health screener

Author

Listed:
  • Lesley Steinman
  • Oudamsambath Phal
  • Ramy Srou
  • Kimkanika Ung
  • James LoGerfo
  • Richard C Veith
  • Tracy W Harachi

Abstract

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear 80% of the burden from common mental health disorders like depression and anxiety. One LMIC, Cambodia, has a mental health care gap due to history of genocide and civil war, persistent poverty, and under-resourced mental health system. Collaborative care models can improve access to and quality of mental health care by integrating care into existing health care infrastructure. While tools like the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are widely used to detect unmet mental health needs and provide measurement-based care, their validity has not been established for many LMICs. We therefore sought to validate the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and develop a brief mental health screener in the Cambodian context. This study was guided by an advisory committee of local mental health, health care, social work, and public health policymakers, practitioners, and researchers. The PHQ-9, GAD-7, and C-SSI were used to identify possible screening items and the HSCL and HTQ were used as criterion instruments to detect depression, anxiety and trauma. Pearson’s correlation was used to assess validity and k-fold cross validation was used to identify which combination of items were most predictive of mental health disorders. Among 498 patients (mean(SD) age 51(12.8) years, 48.6% women, 74.4% married), 19% and 13% screened positive for depression and for anxiety using the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7, respectively. Both the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were strongly correlated with the HSCL and HTQ. The combination of two PHQ-9 items (sleep, worthlessness) and one GAD-7 item (nervousness) most accurately predicted mental health conditions (AUC = 0.980). The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were valid in Cambodia, and we identified several items to screen for emotional distress. We are currently using these tools in a collaborative care model pilot in urban and rural settings and welcome others application to support Cambodian mental health equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesley Steinman & Oudamsambath Phal & Ramy Srou & Kimkanika Ung & James LoGerfo & Richard C Veith & Tracy W Harachi, 2025. "Improving recognition of common mental health disorders in Cambodia: Validation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and development of a brief mental health screener," PLOS Mental Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmen00:0000228
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000228&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmen00:0000228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: mentalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.