IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1005241.html

HIV self-testing and the global diagnostic gap: Addressing a decade of missed opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Reuben Granich
  • Somya Gupta
  • Isabelle Munyangaju
  • Mike Ruffner

Abstract

Summary points: In 2015, a survey-based analysis across 16 sub-Saharan African countries estimated that nearly half of people living with HIV were undiagnosed, implying ~11 million people in the region were outside the treatment cascade. However, HIV self-testing (HIVST), a technology effectively positioned to close this gap, was deployed at negligible scale for a decade following WHO recommendation in 2016. The gap has narrowed, but through conventional testing rather than HIVST, and 2.6 million people in sub-Saharan Africa and 4.9 million globally still did not know their HIV status in 2025. The decade of delay carries a likely avoidable burden of millions of illnesses, deaths and onward transmissions, though this has not been formally modelled.The need for HIVST in low- and middle-income countries was estimated at 177 million self-tests in 2020, rising to 192 million by 2025. Confirmed procurement over the same period reached only 21 million kits in total, an average of 5.3 million per year, or 3% of estimated annual need.Four interlocking structural failures explain this missed opportunity: 1) research capture through demonstration projects that substituted for population-scale deployment; 2) the early supervised self-testing paradox in which provider-assisted delivery reconstituted the clinic barriers HIVST was designed to bypass; 3) procurement conservatism that suppressed market development; and 4) an accountability failure with no publicly accessible Africa-level volume series, making the scale of the missed opportunity impossible to measure from published data.Four actions could improve access: 1) mandatory public reporting of HIVST commodity volumes; 2) a dedicated Africa-specific distribution target of at least 50 million kits per year within the UNAIDS 95-95-95 framework; 3) community-based distribution as the default model for the general population; and 4) explicit HIVST volume commitments in the GHSD’s 2026–2030 memoranda of understanding and work plans. In this Policy Forum article, Isabelle Munyangaju and colleagues discuss why the roll-out and scale-up of HIV self-testing over the last decade has been inadequate, and highlight what is needed—learning from past failures around governance, distribution and financing—to close the diagnostic gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuben Granich & Somya Gupta & Isabelle Munyangaju & Mike Ruffner, 2026. "HIV self-testing and the global diagnostic gap: Addressing a decade of missed opportunity," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1005241
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1005241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.