IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1005069.html

Point-of-care early infant HIV diagnosis at birth in a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in Mozambique and Tanzania: A comparative cost and cost-effectiveness study

Author

Listed:
  • Kira Elsbernd
  • Issa Sabi
  • Ilesh V Jani
  • Chishamiso Mudenyanga
  • Siriel Boniface
  • Arlete Mahumane
  • Joaquim Lequechane
  • Falume Chale
  • Bindiya Meggi
  • Kassia Pereira
  • Raphael Edom
  • Anange F Lwilla
  • W Chris Buck
  • Nyanda Elias Ntinyinya
  • Michael Hoelscher
  • Till Baernighausen
  • Arne Kroidl
  • Stefan Kohler
  • the LIFE Study Consortium

Abstract

Background: Timely access to early infant diagnosis (EID) is crucial for newborns with HIV, as late diagnosis can delay lifesaving antiretroviral treatment (ART). We assessed the comparative cost and cost-effectiveness of integrating point-of-care EID at birth into routine care in primary healthcare settings. Methods and findings: This pre-specified secondary analysis was nested in the cluster-randomized LIFE study conducted at 28 primary healthcare facilities in Mozambique and Tanzania from October 2019 to September 2021. We estimated the health system cost of point-of-care birth plus 4–8-week HIV testing (very early infant diagnosis; VEID) compared to standard-of-care (SoC) testing at 4–8 weeks only, both with immediate ART initiation. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of VEID relative to SoC with respect to ART initiation within one week of life using Bayesian hierarchical models. As this is an intermediate outcome, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) cannot be directly compared to available life-year-based cost-effectiveness thresholds. To contextualize results, we derived the minimum life-years gained per early ART initiation required for VEID to meet standard thresholds in a break-even analysis. Conclusions: Adding birth testing improved early ART initiation but was unlikely to be cost-effective relative to standard thresholds given current prices, vertical transmission rates, and knowledge of long-term health benefits. Cost-effectiveness could be achieved at current costs if early ART translates to substantial long-term health benefits or if targeted to infants at high risk of vertical transmission. Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?: Kira Elsbernd and colleagues analyze the cost and cost effectiveness of adding HIV diagnosis at birth to routine practice to promote earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy in primary healthcare facilities in Mozambique and Tanzania.

Suggested Citation

  • Kira Elsbernd & Issa Sabi & Ilesh V Jani & Chishamiso Mudenyanga & Siriel Boniface & Arlete Mahumane & Joaquim Lequechane & Falume Chale & Bindiya Meggi & Kassia Pereira & Raphael Edom & Anange F Lwil, 2026. "Point-of-care early infant HIV diagnosis at birth in a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in Mozambique and Tanzania: A comparative cost and cost-effectiveness study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1005069
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1005069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1005069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1005069&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1005069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.