IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004922.html

Teleultrasound in obstetrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Le Vance
  • Matthew Vaughan
  • Tanvi Bhatia
  • Leo Gurney
  • Victoria Hodgetts Morton
  • R Katie Morris

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is a common diagnostic modality in obstetrics to evaluate the fetal condition, frequently used in pregnant women classifying as high-risk. Modifications to guidelines, implementation of national initiatives, combined with an aging obstetric population has led to an increased number of high-risk patients. This places a substantial strain on outpatient obstetric services to accommodate the increased demand for serial antenatal ultrasound scans. Methods and findings: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and PubMed databases from inception to December 2025. Primary research studies evaluating the feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, educational utility, acceptability, and economic viability of antenatal teleultrasound usage were included. Random effects meta-analysis was used, and results were reported as pooled proportions or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Diagnostic accuracy was further assessed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. Conclusion: This review demonstrated the potential applicability and value of obstetric teleultrasound. This novel care model is everchanging and new devices/systems capable of telesonography are of clinical and scientific relevance. Presently, additional high-quality evidence is required, particularly using teleultrasound in a clinical context, whilst ensuring sufficient methodological detail and consistent outcome reporting. Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?: Given recent advancements in digital technology, Jack Le Vance and colleagues assess whether teleultrasound is feasible, acceptable, diagnostically accurate and cost effective for antenatal care.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Le Vance & Matthew Vaughan & Tanvi Bhatia & Leo Gurney & Victoria Hodgetts Morton & R Katie Morris, 2026. "Teleultrasound in obstetrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(2), pages 1-40, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004922
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004922&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.