IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004809.html

Brain morphology in Anorexia Nervosa and its subtypes: A multi-cohort study of individual participant data

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Bernardoni
  • Dominic Arold
  • Luis Schoppik
  • Klaas Bahnsen
  • Ruiyang Ge
  • Clara Moreau
  • Lasse Bang
  • Federico D’Agata
  • Giovanni Abbate-Daga
  • Christian K Tamnes
  • Iain Campbell
  • Owen O’Daly
  • Ulrike Schmidt
  • Guido Frank
  • Stefanie Horndasch
  • Andreas Hess
  • Arnd Dörfler
  • Hans-Christoph Friederich
  • Joe Simon
  • Angela Favaro
  • Luca Lavagnino
  • Christina E Wierenga
  • Amanda Bischoff-Grethe
  • Amy E Miles
  • Allan Kaplan
  • Aristotle Voineskos
  • Paul A M Smeets
  • Annemarie A van Elburg
  • Unna Danner
  • Sophia I Thomopoulos
  • Laura Berner
  • Neda Jahanshad
  • Sophia Frangou
  • Joseph A King
  • Paul Thompson
  • Stefan Ehrlich

Abstract

Background: In a recent coordinated meta-analysis of neuroimaging data, we reported gray matter (GM) alterations in acutely underweight patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). Here, we extend these findings by examining individual variation in brain structure within AN, individual-level differentiation between AN and healthy controls (HC), and differences between AN subtypes, with potential relevance for understanding clinical heterogeneity. Methods and findings: We analyzed individual-level data from 11 international sites in the ENIGMA Eating Disorders Working Group, including 570 female participants with AN and 739 HC. We examined cortical thickness, cortical surface area and subcortical volumes in AN versus HC using three complementary approaches: (i) group-level differences in a mega-analysis correcting for age effects, (ii) frequencies of extreme deviations (infra-/supranormal; z 1.96) based on normative reference models by the CentileBrain Initiative, and (iii) individual-level classification performance using machine learning. The same analytic framework was applied to compare AN restricting versus binge-eating/purging subtype, additionally correcting for BMI effects. Conclusion: Using a mega-analytic approach, we confirm widespread GM deficits in AN, show that these alterations are (in some patients) extreme, and demonstrate that they enable robust classification with superior performance compared to most MRI-based psychiatric classification studies. The absence of differences between AN subtypes may reflect shared neurobiology, though other imaging modalities may reveal distinctions beyond brain structure. Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?: In a multi-cohort study, Bernardoni and colleagues investigate potential brain structure differences between patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), and AN patients versus healthy controls, using individual participant data.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Bernardoni & Dominic Arold & Luis Schoppik & Klaas Bahnsen & Ruiyang Ge & Clara Moreau & Lasse Bang & Federico D’Agata & Giovanni Abbate-Daga & Christian K Tamnes & Iain Campbell & Owen O’Daly &, 2026. "Brain morphology in Anorexia Nervosa and its subtypes: A multi-cohort study of individual participant data," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004809
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004809
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004809&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.