IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004770.html

Machine learning assisted differentiation of low acuity patients at dispatch: The MADLAD randomized controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Nils Spangler
  • Simon Morelli
  • David Smekal
  • Lennart Edmark
  • Hans Blomberg

Abstract

Background: Resource Constrained Situations (RCS) at Emergency Medical Dispatch centers where there are more patients requiring an ambulance than there are available ambulances are common. Machine Learning (ML) techniques offer a promising but largely untested approach to assessing relative risks among these patients. The study aims to establish whether the provision of ML-based risk scores predicting patient outcomes improves the ability of dispatchers to identify patients at high risk for deterioration in RCS and dispatch the first available ambulance to them. Methods and findings: We performed a parallel-group, randomized trial of adult patients assessed by a dispatch nurse at two study sites in Sweden as requiring a low-priority ambulance response in RCS. Patients were randomized 1:1 to be prioritized with the aid of an ML-based risk assessment tool, or per current clinical practice. The primary outcome was defined in terms of whether the first available ambulance was sent to the patient with the highest National Early Warning Score (NEWS 2) based on subsequently collected vital signs. A total of 1,245 RCS were included in the study. In the intervention arm, 68.3% of RCS were assessed correctly per the primary outcome versus 62.5% in the control group, corresponding to an odds ratio of 1.28 (95% CI [1.00, 1.63], p = 0.047). This study was limited to only patients determined to require a low-priority ambulance response in two Swedish regions, and was underpowered for the primary outcome due to a smaller than expected sample size. Conclusion: This study suggests that clinical ML-based decision support tools may have the ability to influence care provider decisions and improve their capacity to rapidly differentiate between high- and low-risk patients at dispatch. Further research should establish the suitability of these tools in larger cohorts, for patients with both higher- and lower-levels of priority, and in other settings. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04757194). Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?: In this randomized clinical trial, Douglas Nils Spangler and colleagues assess the potential of a machine learning (ML)–based triage tool to improve emergency triage by supporting dispatchers in identifying patients at high risk of deterioration in resource constrained situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Nils Spangler & Simon Morelli & David Smekal & Lennart Edmark & Hans Blomberg, 2026. "Machine learning assisted differentiation of low acuity patients at dispatch: The MADLAD randomized controlled trial," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004770
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004770&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.