Author
Listed:
- Camila Bonfim
- Flávia Alves
- Maurício L Barreto
- Vikram Patel
- Daiane Borges Machado
Abstract
Background: Interpersonal violence is a significant public health issue, increasing mortality risks for those affected. While Cash Transfer Programs offer health benefits, their role in addressing the needs of interpersonal violence victims remains unclear. This study aims to examine the association between Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program (BFP) participation and reduced mortality rates among interpersonal violence victims. Methods and findings: This cohort study was conducted using data from 100 Million Brazilian Cohort, which were linked with interpersonal violence registries (2011−2015). All individuals with a record of interpersonal violence following their registration in Brazil’s primary social assistance system during the study period were included. The primary outcome was overall mortality, while secondary outcomes comprised deaths due to natural and unnatural causes, as recorded in the Mortality Information System (SIM) and classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). We used Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score-based method to analyze overall mortality and competing risk models to assess specific causes of death, estimating the association between BFP participation and mortality rates. A total of 29,075 individuals who were victims of interpersonal violence were followed throughout the five-year period. A total of 990 individuals died from overall causes. BFP participation was associated with an 18% reduction in overall mortality rate (hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% CI [0.70,0.95]; p = 0.011) and a 66% reduction in mortality rate from natural causes (HR 0.34 [95% CI 0.28, 0.41]; p
Suggested Citation
Camila Bonfim & Flávia Alves & Maurício L Barreto & Vikram Patel & Daiane Borges Machado, 2026.
"Conditional cash transfer and mortality among interpersonal violence victims: A cohort study,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(5), pages 1-16, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004673
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004673
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.