IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004604.html

Evaluation of rotavirus, pneumococcal conjugate and human papillomavirus vaccination in four Pacific island countries: A cost-effectiveness modelling study

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Carvalho
  • Emma Watts
  • Victoria L Oliver
  • Andrew Clark
  • Murat Hakan Ozturk
  • Siale Akauola
  • Clare Whelan
  • Take Naseri
  • Kylie Jenkins
  • Inez Mikkelsen-Lopez
  • Ki Fung Kelvin Lam
  • Rommel Rabanal
  • Ross McLeod
  • Mark Jit
  • Fiona M Russell

Abstract

Background: The introduction of rotavirus vaccine (RVV), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPVV) has been slow in Pacific Island Countries, particularly among middle-income countries. To assist decision-making on the simultaneous introduction of these three vaccines, cost-effectiveness and budget impact evaluations were undertaken in Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, using locally relevant data. Methods and findings: A proportionate outcomes model was used to evaluate vaccine introduction in each country from a health systems perspective, using country-specific data supplemented with regional and global estimates. A 10-year vaccination program was modelled from 2021, with costs and outcomes (disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) summed over a life-time horizon and discounted at 3%. Vaccine dose costs were based on Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Revolving Fund prices, with lower-priced products also explored. Introduction of all three vaccines in all countries could prevent over 1,000 deaths over the lifetimes of the vaccinated cohorts. The cost per DALY averted at PAHO Revolving Fund prices ranged from 42% to 73% of the per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in each country, and 15% to 58% for lower-priced vaccines. The budget impact ranged from 359% (Samoa) to 1,368% (Vanuatu) of the 2019 vaccine budgets, and 149% (Samoa) to 775% (Vanuatu) for lower-priced vaccines. Cost-effectiveness results were most sensitive to disease burden, discount rate, vaccine efficacy, and program costs. A limitation of our study is the reliance on data from Fiji to inform disease burden, as availability of country-specific data was limited. Conclusions: With development partner support, introduction of HPVV, PCV and RVV may represent good value for money in Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, depending on willingness to pay thresholds. However, inclusion of these three vaccines will place considerable burden on immunisation budgets. Financial sustainability requires increases in immunisation budgets and negotiation of affordable vaccine prices. This analysis provides evidence of the benefit of introducing new vaccines, but shows the importance of affordable pricing to ensure sustainability for small Pacific Island countries. Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?: In a modelling study, Natalie Carvalho and colleagues assessed the cost-effectiveness of simultaneously introducing rotavirus, pneumococcal conjugate and human papillomavirus vaccination in the Pacific Island countries Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Carvalho & Emma Watts & Victoria L Oliver & Andrew Clark & Murat Hakan Ozturk & Siale Akauola & Clare Whelan & Take Naseri & Kylie Jenkins & Inez Mikkelsen-Lopez & Ki Fung Kelvin Lam & Rommel , 2026. "Evaluation of rotavirus, pneumococcal conjugate and human papillomavirus vaccination in four Pacific island countries: A cost-effectiveness modelling study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(2), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004604
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004604&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.