Author
Listed:
- Milou M F Schuurbiers
- Christopher G Smith
- Koen J Hartemink
- Robert C Rintoul
- Davina Gale
- Kim Monkhorst
- Bas L R Mandos
- Anna L Paterson
- Daan van den Broek
- Nitzan Rosenfeld
- Michel M van den Heuvel
- On Behalf of the LEMA Study Group and the LUCID Study Group
Abstract
Background: Despite treatment with curative intent, many patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop recurrence. The current challenge is to identify high-risk patients to guide adjuvant treatment. Identification of residual disease by detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may allow more accurate clinical decision-making, but its reliability in NSCLC is not established. We aimed to build on previous data to validate a tissue-informed personalized ctDNA assay, to predict recurrence in patients with early-stage disease. Methods and findings: Tumor tissue and plasma was collected from patients with stage 0–III NSCLC enrolled to LEMA (Lung cancer Early Molecular Assessment trial, NCT02894853). Serial plasma was collected before and after definitive treatment, with the latter including key timeframes of interest (1–3 days post-treatment, between 14 and 122 days after treatment end, and ≥14 days after treatment end). Somatic mutations identified by tumor exome sequencing were used to design patient-specific assays, to analyze ctDNA. Results were compared and combined with an independent dataset (LUCID; LUng Cancer CIrculating Tumour Dna study, NCT04153526). In LEMA, 130 patients (57% male; median age 66 years (range 44–82); 69% adenocarcinoma, 22% squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); 3%/49%/19%/29% with stage 0/I/II/III) were treated with curative intent. Tumor tissue originated from surgical resection or diagnostic biopsy in 118 and 12 patients respectively. LUCID included 88 patients (51% male; median age 72 years (range 44–88); 63% adenocarcinoma, 31% SCC; 49%/28%/23% with stage I/II/III). Before treatment, ctDNA was detected in 48% LEMA and 51% LUCID patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of ctDNA detection post-treatment (≥1 positive sample ≥14 days after treatment end) to predict recurrence were 61%, 97%, 92% and 84% for LEMA and 64%, 96%, 90% and 83% for LUCID. In the combined cohort, ctDNA detection after treatment was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 11.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) [7.0,18.7]; p
Suggested Citation
Milou M F Schuurbiers & Christopher G Smith & Koen J Hartemink & Robert C Rintoul & Davina Gale & Kim Monkhorst & Bas L R Mandos & Anna L Paterson & Daan van den Broek & Nitzan Rosenfeld & Michel M va, 2025.
"Recurrence prediction using circulating tumor DNA in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after treatment with curative intent: A retrospective validation study,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(4), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004574
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004574
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.