Author
Listed:
- Dongqing Wang
- Uttara Partap
- Enju Liu
- Janaína Calu Costa
- Ilana R Cliffer
- Molin Wang
- Sudeer Kumar Nookala
- Vishak Subramoney
- Brittany Briggs
- Imran Ahmed
- Alemayehu Argaw
- Shabina Ariff
- Nita Bhandari
- Ranadip Chowdhury
- Daniel Erchick
- Armando García-Guerra
- Masoumah Ghaffarpour
- Giles Hanley-Cook
- Lieven Huybregts
- Fyezah Jehan
- Fatemeh Kaseb
- Nancy F Krebs
- Carl Lachat
- Tsering Pema Lama
- Dharma S Manandhar
- Elizabeth M McClure
- Sophie E Moore
- Ameer Muhammad
- Lynnette M Neufeld
- Andrew M Prentice
- Amado D Quezada-Sánchez
- Dominique Roberfroid
- Naomi M Saville
- Yasir Shafiq
- Bhim P Shrestha
- Bakary Sonko
- Sajid Soofi
- Sunita Taneja
- James M Tielsch
- Laéticia Céline Toe
- Naser Valaei
- Wafaie W Fawzi
Abstract
Background: Understanding the effects of balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplements on gestational weight gain (GWG) and how the effects differ depending on maternal characteristics and the nutritional composition of the supplements will inform the implementation of prenatal BEP interventions. Methods and findings: Individual participant data from 11 randomized controlled trials of prenatal BEP supplements (N = 12,549, with 5,693 in the BEP arm and 6,856 in the comparison arm) in low- and middle-income countries were used. The primary outcomes included GWG adequacy (%) and the estimated total GWG at delivery as continuous outcomes, and severely inadequate ( 125% adequacy) as binary outcomes; all variables were calculated based on the Institute of Medicine recommendations. Linear and log-binomial models were used to estimate study-specific mean differences or risk ratios (RRs), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the effects of prenatal BEP on the GWG outcomes. The study-specific estimates were pooled using meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted by individual characteristics. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted for study-level characteristics. Compared to the comparison group, prenatal BEP led to a 6% greater GWG percent adequacy (95% CI: 2.18, 9.56; p = 0.002), a 0.59 kg greater estimated total GWG at delivery (95% CI, 0.12, 1.05; p = 0.014), a 10% lower risk of severely inadequate GWG (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.99; p = 0.025), and a 7% lower risk of inadequate GWG (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97; p = 0.001). The effects of prenatal BEP on GWG outcomes were stronger in studies with a targeted approach, where BEP supplements were provided to participants in the intervention arm under specific criteria such as low body mass index or low GWG, compared to studies with an untargeted approach, where BEP supplements were provided to all participants allocated to the intervention arm. Conclusions: Prenatal BEP supplements are effective in increasing GWG and reducing the risk of inadequate weight gain during pregnancy. BEP supplementation targeted toward pregnant women with undernutrition may be a promising approach to delivering the supplements. Using individual participant data, Dongqing Wang and colleagues find that prenatal balanced energy and protein supplements can increase gestational weight gain.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:
Suggested Citation
Dongqing Wang & Uttara Partap & Enju Liu & Janaína Calu Costa & Ilana R Cliffer & Molin Wang & Sudeer Kumar Nookala & Vishak Subramoney & Brittany Briggs & Imran Ahmed & Alemayehu Argaw & Shabina Arif, 2025.
"The effect of prenatal balanced energy and protein supplementation on gestational weight gain: An individual participant data meta-analysis in low- and middle-income countries,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(2), pages 1-28, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004523
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004523
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.