IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment initiation among bacteriologically negative individuals evaluated for tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sun Kim
  • Melike Hazal Can
  • Tefera B Agizew
  • Andrew F Auld
  • Maria Elvira Balcells
  • Stephanie Bjerrum
  • Keertan Dheda
  • Susan E Dorman
  • Aliasgar Esmail
  • Katherine Fielding
  • Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro
  • Colleen F Hanrahan
  • Wakjira Kebede
  • Mikashmi Kohli
  • Anne F Luetkemeyer
  • Carol Mita
  • Byron W P Reeve
  • Denise Rossato Silva
  • Sedona Sweeney
  • Grant Theron
  • Anete Trajman
  • Anna Vassall
  • Joshua L Warren
  • Marcel Yotebieng
  • Ted Cohen
  • Nicolas A Menzies

Abstract

Background: Globally, over one-third of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) disease diagnoses are made based on clinical criteria after a negative bacteriological test result. There is limited information on the factors that determine clinicians’ decisions to initiate TB treatment when initial bacteriological test results are negative. Methods and findings: We performed a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis using studies conducted between January 2010 and December 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42022287613). We included trials or cohort studies that enrolled individuals evaluated for TB in routine settings. In these studies, participants were evaluated based on clinical examination and routinely used diagnostics and were followed for ≥1 week after the initial test result. We used hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression to identify factors associated with treatment initiation following a negative result on an initial bacteriological test (e.g., sputum smear microscopy (SSM), Xpert MTB/RIF). Conclusions: Multiple factors influenced decisions to initiate TB treatment despite negative test results. Clinicians were substantially less likely to treat in the absence of a positive test result when using more sensitive, PCR-based diagnostics. Sun Kim and colleagues conducted a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to investigate the factors that influence a clinician’s decision to initial TB treatment when bacteriological tests are negative.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Sun Kim & Melike Hazal Can & Tefera B Agizew & Andrew F Auld & Maria Elvira Balcells & Stephanie Bjerrum & Keertan Dheda & Susan E Dorman & Aliasgar Esmail & Katherine Fielding & Alberto L Garcia-Bast, 2025. "Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment initiation among bacteriologically negative individuals evaluated for tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004502
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.