IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A latent class assessment of healthcare access factors and disparities in breast cancer care timeliness

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew R Dunn
  • Didong Li
  • Marc A Emerson
  • Caroline A Thompson
  • Hazel B Nichols
  • Sarah C Van Alsten
  • Mya L Roberson
  • Stephanie B Wheeler
  • Lisa A Carey
  • Terry Hyslop
  • Jennifer Elston Lafata
  • Melissa A Troester

Abstract

Background: Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment lead to worse survival and quality of life. Racial disparities in care timeliness have been reported, but few studies have examined access at multiple points along the care continuum (diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment duration, and genomic testing). Methods and findings: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) Phase 3 is a population-based, case-only cohort (n = 2,998, 50% black) of patients with invasive breast cancer diagnoses (2008 to 2013). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to group participants based on patterns of factors within 3 separate domains: socioeconomic status (“SES”), “care barriers,” and “care use.” These classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stages III–IV at diagnosis), delayed treatment initiation (more than 30 days between diagnosis and first treatment), prolonged treatment duration (time between first and last treatment–by treatment modality), and receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing (evaluated among patients with early stage, ER+ (estrogen receptor-positive), HER2- (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative) disease). Associations were evaluated using adjusted linear-risk regression to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Delayed diagnosis models were adjusted for age; delayed and prolonged treatment models were adjusted for age and tumor size, stage, and grade at diagnosis; and OncotypeDx models were adjusted for age and tumor size and grade. Conclusions: Black patients face more frequent delays throughout the care continuum, likely stemming from different types of access barriers at key junctures. Improving breast cancer care access will require intervention on multiple aspects of SES and healthcare access. Matthew R Dunn and colleagues use latent class methods to generate composite measures of access to healthcare, including socioeconomic status, care barriers and care use, to examine their association with timeliness of breast cancer care.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew R Dunn & Didong Li & Marc A Emerson & Caroline A Thompson & Hazel B Nichols & Sarah C Van Alsten & Mya L Roberson & Stephanie B Wheeler & Lisa A Carey & Terry Hyslop & Jennifer Elston Lafata &, 2024. "A latent class assessment of healthcare access factors and disparities in breast cancer care timeliness," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004500
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.