Author
Listed:
- Allison Portnoy
- Rebecca A Clark
- Matthew Quaife
- Chathika K Weerasuriya
- Christinah Mukandavire
- Roel Bakker
- Arminder K Deol
- Shelly Malhotra
- Nebiat Gebreselassie
- Matteo Zignol
- So Yoon Sim
- Raymond C W Hutubessy
- Inés Garcia Baena
- Nobuyuki Nishikiori
- Mark Jit
- Richard G White
- Nicolas A Menzies
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable but eliminating it has proven challenging. Safe and effective TB vaccines that can rapidly reduce disease burden are essential for achieving TB elimination. We assessed future costs, cost-savings, and cost-effectiveness of introducing novel TB vaccines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for a range of product characteristics and delivery strategies. Methods and findings: We developed a system of epidemiological and economic models, calibrated to demographic, epidemiological, and health service data in 105 LMICs. For each country, we assessed the likely future course of TB-related outcomes under several vaccine introduction scenarios, compared to a “no-new-vaccine” counterfactual. Vaccine scenarios considered 2 vaccine product profiles (1 targeted at infants, 1 at adolescents/adults), both assumed to prevent progression to active TB. Key economic inputs were derived from the Global Health Cost Consortium, World Health Organization (WHO) patient cost surveys, and the published literature. We estimated the incremental impact of vaccine introduction for a range of health and economic outcomes. In the base-case, we assumed a vaccine price of $4.60 and used a 1× per-capita gross domestic product (GDP) cost-effectiveness threshold (both varied in sensitivity analyses). Vaccine introduction was estimated to require substantial near-term resources, offset by future cost-savings from averted TB burden. From a health system perspective, adolescent/adult vaccination was cost-effective in 64 of 105 LMICs. From a societal perspective (including productivity gains and averted patient costs), adolescent/adult vaccination was projected to be cost-effective in 73 of 105 LMICs and cost-saving in 58 of 105 LMICs, including 96% of countries with higher TB burden. When considering the monetized value of health gains, we estimated that introduction of an adolescent/adult vaccine could produce $283 to 474 billion in economic benefits by 2050. Limited data availability required assumptions and extrapolations that may omit important country-level heterogeneity in epidemiology and costs. Conclusions: TB vaccination would be highly impactful and cost-effective in most LMICs. Further efforts are needed for future development, adoption, and implementation of novel TB vaccines. In a modelling study, Dr. Allison Portnoy and colleagues explore the cost and cost-effectiveness of novel tuberculosis vaccines in low- and middle-income countries.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:
Suggested Citation
Allison Portnoy & Rebecca A Clark & Matthew Quaife & Chathika K Weerasuriya & Christinah Mukandavire & Roel Bakker & Arminder K Deol & Shelly Malhotra & Nebiat Gebreselassie & Matteo Zignol & So Yoon , 2023.
"The cost and cost-effectiveness of novel tuberculosis vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004155
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004155
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.