IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1003360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between prehospital time and outcome of trauma patients in 4 Asian countries: A cross-national, multicenter cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Chi-Hsin Chen
  • Sang Do Shin
  • Jen-Tang Sun
  • Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin
  • Hideharu Tanaka
  • Kyoung Jun Song
  • Kentaro Kajino
  • Akio Kimura
  • Edward Pei-Chuan Huang
  • Ming-Ju Hsieh
  • Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
  • Wen-Chu Chiang

Abstract

Background: Whether rapid transportation can benefit patients with trauma remains controversial. We determined the association between prehospital time and outcome to explore the concept of the “golden hour” for injured patients. Methods and findings: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of trauma patients transported from the scene to hospitals by emergency medical service (EMS) from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2018, using data from the Pan-Asia Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) database. Prehospital time intervals were categorized into response time (RT), scene to hospital time (SH), and total prehospital time (TPT). The outcomes were 30-day mortality and functional status at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association of prehospital time and outcomes to adjust for factors including age, sex, mechanism and type of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and prehospital interventions. Overall, 24,365 patients from 4 countries (645 patients from Japan, 16,476 patients from Korea, 5,358 patients from Malaysia, and 1,886 patients from Taiwan) were included in the analysis. Among included patients, the median age was 45 years (lower quartile [Q1]–upper quartile [Q3]: 25–62), and 15,498 (63.6%) patients were male. Median (Q1–Q3) RT, SH, and TPT were 20 (Q1–Q3: 12–39), 21 (Q1–Q3: 16–29), and 47 (Q1–Q3: 32–60) minutes, respectively. In all, 280 patients (1.1%) died within 30 days after injury. Prehospital time intervals were not associated with 30-day mortality. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) per 10 minutes of RT, SH, and TPT were 0.99 (95% CI 0.92–1.06, p = 0.740), 1.08 (95% CI 1.00–1.17, p = 0.065), and 1.03 (95% CI 0.98–1.09, p = 0.236), respectively. However, long prehospital time was detrimental to functional survival. The aORs of RT, SH, and TPT per 10-minute delay were 1.06 (95% CI 1.04–1.08, p

Suggested Citation

  • Chi-Hsin Chen & Sang Do Shin & Jen-Tang Sun & Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin & Hideharu Tanaka & Kyoung Jun Song & Kentaro Kajino & Akio Kimura & Edward Pei-Chuan Huang & Ming-Ju Hsieh & Matthew Huei-Ming, 2020. "Association between prehospital time and outcome of trauma patients in 4 Asian countries: A cross-national, multicenter cohort study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003360
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003360&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1003360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.