IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine with and without primaquine on Plasmodium vivax recurrence: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J Commons
  • Julie A Simpson
  • Kamala Thriemer
  • Tesfay Abreha
  • Ishag Adam
  • Nicholas M Anstey
  • Ashenafi Assefa
  • Ghulam R Awab
  • J Kevin Baird
  • Bridget E Barber
  • Cindy S Chu
  • Prabin Dahal
  • André Daher
  • Timothy M E Davis
  • Arjen M Dondorp
  • Matthew J Grigg
  • Georgina S Humphreys
  • Jimee Hwang
  • Harin Karunajeewa
  • Moses Laman
  • Kartini Lidia
  • Brioni R Moore
  • Ivo Mueller
  • Francois Nosten
  • Ayodhia P Pasaribu
  • Dhelio B Pereira
  • Aung P Phyo
  • Jeanne R Poespoprodjo
  • Carol H Sibley
  • Kasia Stepniewska
  • Inge Sutanto
  • Guy Thwaites
  • Tran T Hien
  • Nicholas J White
  • Timothy William
  • Charles J Woodrow
  • Philippe J Guerin
  • Ric N Price

Abstract

Background: Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended for uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria in areas of emerging chloroquine resistance. We undertook a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) with or without primaquine (PQ) on the risk of recurrent P. vivax. Methods and findings: Clinical efficacy studies of uncomplicated P. vivax treated with DP or AL and published between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2018, were identified by conducting a systematic review registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42016053310. Investigators of eligible studies were invited to contribute individual patient data that were pooled using standardised methodology. The effect of mg/kg dose of piperaquine/lumefantrine, ACT administered, and PQ on the rate of P. vivax recurrence between days 7 and 42 after starting treatment were investigated by Cox regression analyses according to an a priori analysis plan. Secondary outcomes were the risk of recurrence assessed on days 28 and 63. Nineteen studies enrolling 2,017 patients were included in the analysis. The risk of recurrent P. vivax at day 42 was significantly higher in the 384 patients treated with AL alone (44.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.7–49.8) compared with the 812 patients treated with DP alone (9.3%, 95% CI 7.1–12.2): adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 12.63 (95% CI 6.40–24.92), p

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J Commons & Julie A Simpson & Kamala Thriemer & Tesfay Abreha & Ishag Adam & Nicholas M Anstey & Ashenafi Assefa & Ghulam R Awab & J Kevin Baird & Bridget E Barber & Cindy S Chu & Prabin Dahal , 2019. "The efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine with and without primaquine on Plasmodium vivax recurrence: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002928
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002928
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002928&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.