IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simplified clinical algorithm for identifying patients eligible for same-day HIV treatment initiation (SLATE): Results from an individually randomized trial in South Africa and Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Sydney Rosen
  • Mhairi Maskew
  • Bruce A Larson
  • Alana T Brennan
  • Isaac Tsikhutsu
  • Matthew P Fox
  • Lungisile Vezi
  • Margaret Bii
  • Willem D F Venter

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization recommends "same-day" initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV patients who are eligible and ready. Identifying efficient, safe, and feasible procedures for determining same-day eligibility and readiness is now a priority. The Simplified Algorithm for Treatment Eligibility (SLATE) study evaluated a clinical algorithm that allows healthcare workers to determine eligibility for same-day treatment and to initiate ART at the patient’s first clinic visit. Methods and findings: SLATE was an individually randomized trial at three outpatient clinics in urban settlements in Johannesburg, South Africa and three hospital clinics in western Kenya. Adult, nonpregnant, HIV-positive, ambulatory patients presenting for any HIV care, including HIV testing, but not yet on ART were enrolled and randomized to the SLATE algorithm arm or standard care. The SLATE algorithm used four screening tools—a symptom self-report, medical history questionnaire, physical examination, and readiness assessment—to ascertain eligibility for same-day initiation or refer for further care. Follow-up was by record review, and analysis was conducted by country. We report primary outcomes of 1) ART initiation ≤28 days and 2) initiation ≤28 days and retention in care ≤8 months of enrollment. From March 7, 2017 to April 17, 2018, we enrolled 600 patients (median [IQR] age 34 [29–40] and CD4 count 286 [128–490]; 63% female) in South Africa and 477 patients in Kenya (median [IQR] age 35 [29–43] and CD4 count 283 [117–541]; 58% female). In the intervention arm, 78% of patients initiated ≤28 days in South Africa, compared to 68% in the standard arm (risk difference [RD] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 10% [3%–17%]); in Kenya, 94% of intervention-arm patients initiated ≤28 days compared to 89% in the standard arm (6% [0.5%–11%]). By 8 months in South Africa, 161/298 (54%) intervention-arm patients had initiated and were retained, compared to 146/302 (48%) in the standard arm (6% [(2% to 14%]). By 8 months in Kenya, the corresponding retention outcomes were identical in both arms (137/240 [57%] of intervention-arm patients and 136/237 [57%] of standard-arm patients). Limitations of the trial included limited geographic representativeness, exclusion of patients too ill to participate, missing viral load data, greater study fidelity to the algorithm than might be achieved in standard care, and secular changes in standard care over the course of the study. Conclusions: In South Africa, the SLATE algorithm increased uptake of ART within 28 days by 10% and showed a numerical increase (6%) in retention at 8 months. In Kenya, the algorithm increased uptake of ART within 28 days by 6% but found no difference in retention at 8 months. Eight-month retention was poor in both arms and both countries. These results suggest that a simple structured algorithm for same-day treatment initiation procedures is feasible and can increase and accelerate ART uptake but that early retention on treatment remains problematic. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02891135, registered September 1, 2016. First participant enrolled March 6, 2017 in South Africa and July 13, 2017 in Kenya. Sydney Rosen and colleagues investigate the performance of a screening algorithm to assess eligibility for rapid HIV treatment initiation.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Sydney Rosen & Mhairi Maskew & Bruce A Larson & Alana T Brennan & Isaac Tsikhutsu & Matthew P Fox & Lungisile Vezi & Margaret Bii & Willem D F Venter, 2019. "Simplified clinical algorithm for identifying patients eligible for same-day HIV treatment initiation (SLATE): Results from an individually randomized trial in South Africa and Kenya," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002912
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002912
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002912&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mhairi Maskew & Alana T Brennan & Matthew P Fox & Lungisile Vezi & Willem D F Venter & Peter Ehrenkranz & Sydney Rosen, 2020. "A clinical algorithm for same-day HIV treatment initiation in settings with high TB symptom prevalence in South Africa: The SLATE II individually randomized clinical trial," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Ofole Mgbako & Magdalena E. Sobieszczyk & Susan Olender & Peter Gordon & Jason Zucker & Susan Tross & Delivette Castor & Robert H. Remien, 2020. "Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy: The Need for a Health Equity Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Bruce A Larson & Sophie J S Pascoe & Amy Huber & Lawrence C Long & Joshua Murphy & Jacqui Miot & Nicole Fraser-Hurt & Matthew P Fox & Sydney Rosen, 2021. "Fast-track treatment initiation counselling in South Africa: A cost-outcomes analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.