Author
Listed:
- Carl Lachat
- Dana Hawwash
- Marga C Ocké
- Christina Berg
- Elisabet Forsum
- Agneta Hörnell
- Christel Larsson
- Emily Sonestedt
- Elisabet Wirfält
- Agneta Åkesson
- Patrick Kolsteren
- Graham Byrnes
- Willem De Keyzer
- John Van Camp
- Janet E Cade
- Nadia Slimani
- Myriam Cevallos
- Matthias Egger
- Inge Huybrechts
Abstract
Background: Concerns have been raised about the quality of reporting in nutritional epidemiology. Research reporting guidelines such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement can improve quality of reporting in observational studies. Herein, we propose recommendations for reporting nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research by extending the STROBE statement into Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut). Methods and Findings: Recommendations for the reporting of nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research were developed following a systematic and consultative process, coordinated by a multidisciplinary group of 21 experts. Consensus on reporting guidelines was reached through a three-round Delphi consultation process with 53 external experts. In total, 24 recommendations for nutritional epidemiology were added to the STROBE checklist. Conclusion: When used appropriately, reporting guidelines for nutritional epidemiology can contribute to improve reporting of observational studies with a focus on diet and health. Carl Lachat and colleagues describe the STROBE-nut reporting guideline extension to improve reporting of observational studies that focus on diet and health.
Suggested Citation
Carl Lachat & Dana Hawwash & Marga C Ocké & Christina Berg & Elisabet Forsum & Agneta Hörnell & Christel Larsson & Emily Sonestedt & Elisabet Wirfält & Agneta Åkesson & Patrick Kolsteren & Graham Byrn, 2016.
"Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002036
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002036
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.